Phosphoproteomic characterization of infulenza A virus infected human macrophages
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): Q Exactive
ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (human)
TISSUE(S): Cell Culture, Macrophage
DISEASE(S): Influenza
SUBMITTER: 
Tuula Nyman
LAB HEAD: Tuula Nyman
PROVIDER: PXD001620 | Pride | 2016-08-08
REPOSITORIES: Pride
Publications
Phosphoproteomics to Characterize Host Response During Influenza A Virus Infection of Human Macrophages.
Söderholm Sandra S Kainov Denis E DE Öhman Tiina T Denisova Oxana V OV Schepens Bert B Kulesskiy Evgeny E Imanishi Susumu Y SY Corthals Garry G Hintsanen Petteri P Aittokallio Tero T Saelens Xavier X Matikainen Sampsa S Nyman Tuula A TA
Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP 20160802 10
Influenza A viruses cause infections in the human respiratory tract and give rise to annual seasonal outbreaks, as well as more rarely dreaded pandemics. Influenza A viruses become quickly resistant to the virus-directed antiviral treatments, which are the current main treatment options. A promising alternative approach is to target host cell factors that are exploited by influenza viruses. To this end, we characterized the phosphoproteome of influenza A virus infected primary human macrophages ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Human primary macrophages were infected with influenza A virus (H3N2/Udorn strain, HA 256) for 6 hrs or left untreated. Cells were collected and lysed with HEPES lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 % NP-40, pH 7.4) including protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails. The cell lysates were centrifuged and the supernatant was collected and the protein content was measured with Bio-Rad DC™ protein assay (Bio-Rad). The proteins were reduced, alkylated, and enzymatically digested in-solution with trypsin. The digestion was stopped by adding FA (final c = 1 %). The samples were centrifuged 9168 x g for 10 min and desalted with Sep-Pak Vac RP C18 cartridges (Waters, MA, USA), following fractionation by strong cation exchange chromatography (SCX). The peptides were separated on a 200 x 4.6 mm, 5 ?m, 200 Å PolySULFOETHYL A™ column (PolyLC, USA). The fractions were vacuum centrifuged and desalted as before, following phosphopeptide-enrichment with PHOS-Select™ Iron Affinity Gel (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA). LC-MS/MS was performed with a Q Exactive hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap tandem mass spectrometer coupled to an EASY-nLC 1000 nanoflow liquid chromatograph (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A 100 ?m x 3 cm trap column and a 75 ?m x 15 cm analytical column were in-house packed with Magic C18AQ resin (200 Å, 5 ?m; Michrom Bioresources). The mobile phases were 2% acetonitrile, 0.2% formic acid (A) and 95% acetonitrile, 0.2% formic acid (B). LC gradient elution condition was 2% B (0 min), 20% B (70 min), 40% B (100 min), and then 100% B (105-110 min), with a flow rate of 300 nl/min. Data dependent acquisition was performed in positive ion mode. MS spectra were acquired from m/z 300 to m/z 2000 at a resolution of 70,000 at m/z 200 with a target value of 1,000,000 and maximum injection time of 120 ms. The 10 most abundant precursor ions of which charge states were 2+ or higher were selected for higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) with an isolation window of 2 and normalized collision energy of 30. MS/MS spectra were acquired at a resolution of 17,500 at m/z 200 with a target value of 50,000, maximum injection time of 250 ms, and the lowest mass fixed at m/z 100. Dynamic exclusion duration was 30 s.
2017-03-29 | MSV000080717 | MassIVE
Project description:2-cell (E1.5) stage embryos were cultured in normal KSOM+AA conditions until E3.5 +2h and thereafter 100 embryos each were moved to control or p38-MAPKi conditions and cultured for another 7 hours (E3.5 +9h). The embryos were then washed through pre-warmed (37˚C) Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS, Sigma-Aldrich; Cat. No. H9269) and lysed by moving to a 1.5ml centrifuge tube containing about 15µl of SDT-lysis buffer (4% (w/v) SDS, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 0.1 M DTT). Cell lysis was performed by incubating the tubes in a 95˚C thermoblock for 12 minutes, brief centrifugation at 750 rpm, cooling to room temperature and storage at -80˚C. Individual protein solutions were processed by filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) method with some modifications (see the associated publication for more details). Resulting peptides were cleaned by liquid-liquid extraction (3 iterations) using water saturated ethyl acetate. 1/10th of the FASP eluate was taken out for direct LC-MS measurements, evaporated completely in SpeedVac concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were further transferred into LC-MS vials using 50μL of 2.5% formic acid (FA) in 50% acetonitrile (ACN) and 100μL of pure ACN and with addition of polyethylene glycol (final concentration 0.001%) and concentrated in a SpeedVac concentrator. Phosphopeptides were enriched from the remaining 9/10th of the cleaned FASP eluate after complete solvent evaporation (SpeedVac concentrator) using High-Select™ TiO2 Phosphopeptide Enrichment Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to manufacturer protocol. Phosphopeptide standards (0.1 pmol of MS PhosphoMix 1, 2, 3 Light; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) was added to suspended sample in binding/equilibration buffer. Flow-through fraction was dried and used for second enrichment step using High-Select™ Fe-NTA Phosphopeptide Enrichment Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) according to manufacturer protocol. Resulting phosphopeptides were extracted into LC-MS vials by 2.5% FA in 50% ACN and 100% ACN with addition of polyethylene glycol (final concentration 0.001%) and concentrated in a SpeedVac concentrator). LC-MS/MS analyses of all peptide mixtures (2 peptide solutions for each sample – 1) not enriched; 2) enriched on phosphopeptides using TiO2 enrichment kit) were done using RSLCnano system connected to Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Prior to LC separation, tryptic digests were online concentrated and desalted using trapping column (100 μm × 30 mm, column compartment temperature of 40˚C) filled with 3.5-μm X-Bridge BEH 130 C18 sorbent (Waters). After washing of trapping column with 0.1% FA, the peptides were eluted (flow rate - 300nl/min) from the trapping column onto an analytical column (Acclaim Pepmap100 C18, 3 µm particles, 75 μm × 500 mm; column compartment temperature of 40˚C, Thermo Fisher Scientific) by using 50 or 100 minutes long nonlinear gradient program (1-56% of mobile phase B; mobile phase A: 0.1% FA in water; mobile phase B: 0.1% FA in 80% ACN) for analysis of phosphopeptide enriched fractions or not enriched peptide mixtures, respectively. Equilibration of the trapping column and the analytical column was done prior to sample injection to sample loop. The analytical column outlet was directly connected to the Digital PicoView 550 (New Objective) ion source with sheath gas option and SilicaTip emitter (New Objective; FS360-20-15-N-20-C12) utilization. ABIRD (ESI Source Solutions) was installed. MS data were acquired in a data-dependent strategy with cycle time for 3 seconds and with survey scan (350-2000 m/z). The resolution of the survey scan was 60000 (200 m/z) with a target value of 4×105 ions and maximum injection time of 50ms. HCD MS/MS (30% relative fragmentation energy, normal mass range) spectra were acquired with a target value of 5.0x104. The MS/MS spectra were recorded in Orbitrap at resolving power of 30,000 or 15,000 (200 m/z) and the maximum injection time for MS/MS was 500 or 22 ms for analysis of phosphopeptides enriched fraction or non-enriched peptide mixture, respectively. Dynamic exclusion was enabled for 60 seconds after one MS/MS spectra acquisition. The isolation window for MS/MS fragmentation was set to 1.6 m/z.
2021-07-12 | PXD025754 | Pride
Project description:Flag-YBX1 overexpressed T24 cells pellets were resuspended with 2 volume of lysis buffer (150 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5 mM DTT, 1:100 protease inhibitor cocktail, 400 U/ml RNase inhibitor), and incubated at 4 °C for 30 min with rotation. Then the lysate was centrifuged at 15 000 g for 20 min. Before incubating the lysate with Flag beads, 100ul were taken as input. The anti-Flag M2 magnetic beads (Sigma, 10 μl per mg lysate) were washed with NT2 buffer (200 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 2 mM EDTA, 0.05% NP-40, 0.5 mM DTT, 200 U/ml RNase inhibitor) four times. Cell lysate was mixed with M2 beads and incubated at 4 °C for 4 h with rotation. The beads were washed two times with 1 ml ice-cold NT2 buffer. Then the beads were subject to Micrococal nuclease (NEB) digestion (1:1 000 000 dilution) for 8 min at 37 °C. The beads were cooled on ice immediately for 5 min and washed two times with 1 ml ice-cold 1× PNK+EGTA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 20 mM EDTA, 0.05% NP-40, 200 U/ml RNase inhibitor) and two times with 1 ml ice-cold 1× PK buffer (50 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 0.2% SDS, 200 U/ml RNase inhibitor). Then the beads were digested with 200 μl pre-heated (20 min at 50 °C) Proteinase K and RNAs were extracted with an equal volume of Acid-Phenol: Chloroform, pH 4.5 (Ambion). The RNAs were subjected to rRNA removal and Bisseq. The libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq X-Ten platform at Novogene (Tianjin, CA) with paired-end 150 bp read length.The m5C sites were called using meRanCall from meRanTK (FDR < 0.01).
2019-07-02 | GSE133625 | GEO
Project description:Glands were frozen at -80 ºC immediately after being retrieved and stored under this condition until initiating the proteomics analysis protocol. Glands were washed with cold PBS and immersed in 120 l of homogenization buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10 mM DTT, 4% (w/v) SDS). Glands were boiled for 5 min, incubated overnight at 4 ºC and centrifuged at 4 ºC and 13000 rpm for 10 min. The whole gland proteome of each gland was concentrated as described elsewhere (Bonzon-Kulichenko, F. Garcia-Marques, M. Trevisan-Herraz and J. Vazquez, Journal of Proteome Research, 2015, 14, 700-710 (DOI:10.1021/pr5007284).Briefly, samples were loaded into an SDS-PAGE gel (0.5 mm-thick, 4% stacking, and 10% resolving) and the electrophoresis process was stopped when the front entered 2 mm into the resolving gel. The unseparated protein bands were then visualized by Coomassie staining, excised and digested at 37 ºC overnight with 500 l of 25 g/l chymotrypsin (Promega) in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8 containing 10 mM CaCl2. The cleaved peptides were extracted by incubation for 2 h in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8 on shaking, acidized with 1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid, desalted onto C18 cartridges (Oasis, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA), and dried down.The analysis of the samples proceeded through liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using an Easy nLC 1000 nano-HPLC coupled to a Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Themo Scientific). Peptides were injected onto a C18 reverse-phase precolumn (Acclaim PepMap100, 75-m i.d., 3-m particle size, 2-cm length, Thermo Scientific), and a reverse-phase analytical column (Acclaim PepMap 100, 75-m, i.d., 3-m particle size, 50-cm length, Thermo Scientific) in buffer A [0.1% formic acid (v/v)] and eluted with a 60 min linear gradient of buffer B [90% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid (v/v)], at 200 nL/min. Mass spectrometry (MS) runs consisted of 70000 FT-resolution spectra in the 390-1200 m/z wide range, followed by data-dependent MS/MS spectra of the 15 most intense parent ions acquired along the chromatographic run. High-energy collisional (HCD) fragmentation was performed at 27% of normalized collision energy and the isolation window for the parent ion mass was established at 2 Da.
2022-12-07 | PXD023141 | Pride
Project description:The concentrations of twenty kinds of hormones in the follicular fluid were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). An Agilent 1200 series high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) instrument (Agilent, USA) was utilized. A PAL autosampler (CTC, Swiss) and a Gemini-NX-C18 column (2.0 mm×50 mm, 3 μm, Waters, USA) were used. The ion source was an API-4000 quadrupole electrostatic field orbit trap high-resolution mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, USA). The scanning mode was multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) (Agilent-1200 LC system coupled to an API400 mass spectrometer).
2022-08-12 | PXD031559 | Pride
Project description:Proteomic analysis of pervanadate-induced tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in hepatocellular carcinoma WRL 68 cells Protein tyrosine phosphorylation plays critical roles in modulating biological processes such as cellular proliferation, differentiation, migration, apoptosis and metabolism. To profile tyrosine phosphorylated (pTyr) proteins as well as search novel pTyr proteins as cross-talk points among different cellular pathways, we developed a rapid and efficient approach to identify cellular pTyr proteins and their complexes by a combination of subcellular proteomics approach with signal transduction strategies. Human hepatocytic cells from WRL68 cell line were treated with pervanadate (POV), subfractionated into four fractions and then subjected to immunoaffinity purification with anti-pTyr antibody. The eluted mixtures of the anti-pTyr purification were identified by LC-MS/MS. Subcellular fractionation and affinity purification of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins: WRL68 cells were first grown to 80% confluence in MEM complete medium and then the medium replaced with serum free media. After 15 h, the cells were either untreated or stimulated with 0.1 mM pervanadate (1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 3 mM H2O2) for 10 min. 150-mm cultures of WRL 68 cells were rinsed twice with 4? PBS and then scraped from the dish in 750?l of hypotonic buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM NaF, 10 mM IAA, pH 7.5) containing a cocktail of protein inhibitors. After a 20-min incubation on ice, the cells were passed about five times through a 25-g needle. The resulting lysate was subjected to a 15min centrifugation at 1000 rpm at 4?, after which the pellet was resuspended in 250?l of hypotonic buffer and re-extracted by a second round of the trituration and centrifugation. The supernatants of the first and second spins were combined, adjusted to 0.25 M NaCl, and separated into cytosolic (supernatant) and membrane (pellet) fractions bycentrifugation at 19,000 rpm (43,000 g) for 90 min at 4?. All the pellets and total cell lysate were resuspended in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 1% deoxycholic acid sodium) containing 1mM pervanadate with a cocktail of protein inhibitors with sonication aid. Cleared cell lysates were incubated overnight at 4? with 30?l monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine-agrose (Sigma). Precipitated immune complexes were washed three times with 1×HNTG (20 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 10% Glycerol, pH 7.5) and then eluted with 100 mM phenyl phosphate (Sigma) in lysis buffer at 4?. Enzyme digestion, mass spectrometry and protein identification: The sample was digested according to the published method. Chromatography was performed using a surveyor LC system (Thermo Finnigan,SanJose,CA) on C18 reverse phase column(RP, 180 µm x 150 mm, BioBasic® C18, 5 µm, Thermo Hypersil-Keystone). The pump flow rate is split 1:100 for a colum flow rate of 1.5 µL/min.The column effluent is directly electrosprayed using the orthogonal metal needle source without further splitting.Mobile phase A is 0.1% formic acid in water,and the B mobile phase is 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. The separation of peptides obtained by enzymatic digest of bile sample was achieved with a gradient of 2-80% B over 360 min.The column effluent from the reverse phase column was analyzed by LCQ Deca XP ion-trap mass spectrometer.The micro-electrospray interface uses a 30 µm metal needle that is orthogonal to the inlet of the LCQ.The mass spectrometer was set that one full MS scan was followed by three MS/MS scans on the three most intense ion from the MS spectrum with the following Dynamic Exclusion™ settings: repeat count, 1; repeat duration, 0.5 min; exclusion duration, 3.0 min. The acquired MS/MS spectra were automatically searched against protein database for human proteins (SWISS-PROT/TrEMBL) using the TurboSEQUEST program in the BioWorks™ 3.0 software suite. An accepted SEQUEST result had to have a ?Cn score of at least 0.1 (regardless of charge state) and Xcorr (one charge?1.5, two charges?2.0, three charges?2.5). Single peptides that alone identify a protein were manually validated after meeting the above criteria. Bioinformatics analysis: The pI and MW of the proteins were analyzed using ExPASy proteomics tools accessed from http://cn.expasy.org/tools/#proteome. The grand average hydropathicity (GRAVY) values were determined according to Kyte-Doolittle. The protein subcellular location annotation was from SwissProt &TrEMBL protein database (http://us.expasy.org/sprot/). The protein function family was categorized according to Gene Ontology (GO) annotation terms extracted by InterPro (http://www.ebi.ac.uk./interpro/). The annotation of protein phosphorylation was from SwissProt &TrEMBL protein database (http://us.expasy.org/sprot/) and PhosphoSite (http://www.phosphosite.org). The kinases were annotated according to human kinome. Keywords: other
2005-04-07 | GSE2408 | GEO
Project description:Pretreated human follicular fluid was prepared for targeted metabolomics experiments. For this purpose, 12-point standard calibration curves in the respective range with reference material were measured, and the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for each neurotransmitter under investigation were calculated. LC-MS/MS was conducted by an ultra-performance liquid chromatography method using a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 mm×100 mm, 1.7 µm, Waters, USA). The Waters acquisition UPLC was coupled to an API 4000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, USA). The mobile phase A buffer was 10% methanol in water (containing 0.1% formic acid), and the mobile phase B buffer was 50% methanol in water (containing 0.1% formic acid). The LC gradient elution was at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min at 0-8.0 min and 0.4 ml/min at 8.0-17.5 min, then 10%-30% B at 0-6.5 min; 30%-100% B at 6.5-7 min; 100% B at 7-14min; and 100%-10% B at 14-17.5min. The injection volume was 5 µl and the column temperature was set to 40 °C. Twenty-three metabolites (Ach: Acetylcholine chloride; Gln: Glutamine; Glu: Glutamate; His: L-Histidine; NE: norepinephrine; Tyr:Tyrosine; Trp:Tryptophan; Kyn: Kynurenine; GABA: 4-Aminobutyric acid;HisA:Histamine; PA:Picolinic acid;TyrA:Tyramine;DA:Hydroxytyramine hydrochloride; TrpA:Tryptamine;5-HT:Serotonin hydrochloride;E:Adrenaline hydrochloride;KynA:Kynurenic acid;5-HIAA:5-Hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid;DOPA:Levodopa;XA:Xanthurenic acid;VWA:Vanillymandelic Acid; 5-HTTP:5-Hydroxytryptophan;MT:Melatonine)were simultaneously reported in LC-MS/MS multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Data analysis was performed with Analyst 1.6 software.
2022-08-12 | PXD031560 | Pride
Project description:Cells were treated with DMSO (biological triplicate) or degrader at indicated dose and time (Meta Treatment Table) and cells were harvested by centrifugation. Lysis buffer (8 M Urea, 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (EPPS) pH 8.5, Protease and Phosphatase inhibitors from Roche) was added to the cell pellets and homogenized by 20 passes through a 21 gauge (1.25 in. long) needle to achieve a cell lysate with a protein concentration between 1 - 4 mg/mL. A micro-BCA assay (Pierce) was used to determine the final protein concentration in the cell lysate. 200 µg of protein for each sample were reduced and alkylated as previously described1. Proteins were precipitated using methanol/chloroform. In brief, four volumes of methanol were added to the cell lysate, followed by one volume of chloroform, and finally three volumes of water. The mixture was vortexed and centrifuged to separate the chloroform phase from the aqueous phase. The precipitated protein was washed with three volumes of methanol, centrifuged and the resulting washed precipitated protein was allowed to air dry. Precipitated protein was resuspended in 4 M Urea, 50 mM HEPES pH 7.4, followed by dilution to 1 M urea with the addition of 200 mM EPPS, pH 8. Proteins were first digested with LysC (1:50; enzyme:protein) for 12 hours at room temperature. The LysC digestion was diluted to 0.5 M Urea with 200 mM EPPS pH 8 followed by digestion with trypsin (1:50; enzyme:protein) for 6 hours at 37 °C. Tandem mass tag (TMT) reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were dissolved in anhydrous acetonitrile (ACN) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Anhydrous ACN was added to each peptide sample to a final concentration of 30% v/v, and labeling was induced with the addition of TMT reagent to each sample at a ratio of 1:4 peptide:TMT label. The 11 or 16-plex labeling reactions were performed for 1.5 hours at room temperature and the reaction quenched by the addition of hydroxylamine to a final concentration of 0.3% for 15 minutes at room temperature. Each of the sample channels were combined in a 1:1 ratio, desalted using C18 solid phase extraction cartridges (Waters) and analyzed by LC-MS for channel ratio comparison. Samples were then combined using the adjusted volumes determined in the channel ratio analysis and dried down in a speed vacuum. The combined sample was then resuspended in 1% formic acid and acidified (pH 2 - 3) before being subjected to desalting with C18 SPE (Sep-Pak, Waters). Samples were then offline fractionated into 96 fractions by high pH reverse-phase HPLC (Agilent LC1260) through an aeris peptide xb-c18 column (phenomenex) with mobile phase A containing 5% acetonitrile and 10 mM NH4HCO3 in LC-MS grade H2O, and mobile phase B containing 90% acetonitrile and 10 mM NH4HCO3 in LC-MS grade H2O (both pH 8.0). The 96 resulting fractions were then pooled in a non-continuous manner into 24 fractions and these fractions were used for subsequent mass spectrometry analysis. Data were collected using an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) coupled with a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1200 LC pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or an Orbitrap Eclipse Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) coupled with an UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano System. Peptides were separated on an EasySpray ES803a/ES803a.rev2 75 μm inner diameter microcapillary column (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or a 100 µm inner diameter microcapillary column packed with ~ 50 cm of Accucore C18 resin (2.6 µM, 100 Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were separated using a 190 min gradient of 6 - 27% acetonitrile in 1.0% formic acid with a flow rate of 300 or 350 nL/min. Each analysis used an MS3-based TMT method as described previously. The data were acquired using a mass range of m/z 340 – 1350, resolution 120,000, AGC target 5 x 105, maximum injection time 100 ms, dynamic exclusion of 120 seconds for the peptide measurements in the Orbitrap. Data dependent MS2 spectra were acquired in the ion trap with a normalized collision energy (NCE) set at 35%, AGC target set to 1.8 x 104 and a maximum injection time of 120 ms. MS3 scans were acquired in the Orbitrap with a HCD collision energy set to 55%, AGC target set to 2 x 105, maximum injection time of 150 ms, resolution at 50,000 and with a maximum synchronous precursor selection (SPS) precursors set to 10.
2021-07-30 | PXD023636 | Pride
Project description:10 µm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized with xylene; homogenization was performed in lysis-buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 200 mM glycine, 200 mM DTT, 4% SDS)in an ultrasonic bath; samples were incubated under continuous agitation first at 99 °C for 30 min, then at 80 °C for 60 min, afterwards centrifuged at 12,000xg for 10 min. 50 µg of protein lysate were further processed according the GASP (Gel-assisted sample preparation) protocol; peptide identification (IDA, information dependent acquisition) and SWATH measurements by LC-MS/MS on TripleTOF5600 (AB Sciex)
2020-05-18 | PXD012317 | Pride
Project description:This project compares the outer membrane proteome to the proteome of outer membrane vesicles of the bacterium Shewanella onedensis. S. oneidensis outer membrane was purified via the sarkosyl method described in (Brown, 2010). A 50 mL overnight culture of cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 10 min. cell pellet suspended in 20 mL of 20 mM ice-cold sodium phosphate (pH 7.5) and passed four times through a French Press (12000 lb/in2). The lysate was centrifuged at 5,000× g for 30 min to remove unbroken cells. The remaining supernatant was centrifuged at 45,000 × g for 1 h to pellet membranes. Crude membranes were suspended in 20 mL 0.5% Sarkosyl in 20 mM sodium phosphate and shaken horizontally at 200 rpm for 30 min at room temperature. The crude membrane sample was centrifuged at 45,000 × g for 1 h to pellet the OM. The pellet of OM was washed in ice-cold sodium phosphate and recentrifuged. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 5000 x g for 20 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was filtered through 0.45 μm pore size filters to remove remaining bacterial cells. Vesicles were obtained by centrifugation at 38,400 x g for 1 h at 4°C in an Avanti J-20XP centrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Inc). Pelleted vesicles were resuspended in 25 ml of 50 mM HEPES (pH 6.8) and filtered through 0.45 μm pore size filters. Vesicles were again pelleted as described above and finally resuspended in 50 mM HEPES, pH 6.8. Extracellular DNA, flagella, and pili can all be co-purified. Protocol was adapted from (Perez-Cruz, 2013).
2021-11-10 | PXD020577 | Pride