<HashMap><database>bioimages</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><submitter>Damien Garbett</submitter><journal>The Journal of Cell Biology</journal><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-JCBD-201004115</full_dataset_link><attach_to>JCB</attach_to><legend>Representative image stacks from the microvillar rescue assay. Control cells (siGL2) were not treated with siEBP50, and shows cells transfected to express the GFP-Nuc control plasmid. Cells were stained for ezrin (red) and actin (blue) and transfected cells identified as those expressing the GFP-tagged construct (green). Microvilli were visualized on the apical surface of cells by ezrin and phalloidin staining.&lt;br /></legend><legend>Representative images of cells from the microvillar rescue assay. Cells were stained for ezrin (red) and actin (blue) and transfected cells identified as those expressing the GFP-tagged construct (green).</legend><legend>GFP-EBP50 wildtype and PKC phospho-mimetic (S162,339,340D) or –deficient (S162,339,340A) mutants were overexpressed in cells treated with PMA, stained for ezrin (red) and actin (blue) and their apical surface phenotype was scored.</legend><legend>Representative images from the microvillar rescue assay. Transfected cells were identified as expressing GFP-tagged constructs (green) and stained for ezrin (red) and actin (blue). Microvilli were visualized on the apical surface of cells by ezrin and phalloidin staining.</legend><legend>Representative images from the microvillar rescue assay. Cells were stained for ezrin (red) and actin (blue) and transfected cells identified as those expressing the GFP-tagged construct (green).</legend><repository>bioimages</repository><figure_sub>Image 23940 (Figure 10 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16592 (Figure 3 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16607 (Figure 7 - B )</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16598 (Figure 4 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 10 - B</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16602 (Figure 6 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16599 (Figure 4 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16601 (Figure 5 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 7 - B</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 3 - B</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16596 (Figure 3 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16593 (Figure 3 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 4 - B</figure_sub><figure_sub>SupFigure 3</figure_sub><figure_sub>SupFigure 2</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 23941 (Figure 10 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16600 (Figure 5 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16610 (SupFigure 3 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16608 (SupFigure 2 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16609 (SupFigure 3 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16594 (Figure 3 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 5 - B</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16606 (Figure 7 - B )</figure_sub><figure_sub>SupFigure 3 - B</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 5</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 4</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16597 (Figure 4 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 7</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 23942 (Figure 10 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 6</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 10</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16605 (Figure 7 - B )</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16603 (Figure 6 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16604 (Figure 6 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 6 - B</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 23939 (Figure 10 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 3</figure_sub><figure_sub>SupFigure 2 - B</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 16595 (Figure 3 - B)</figure_sub><pubmed_authors>Damien Garbett</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anthony Bretscher</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>David P. LaLonde</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The scaffolding protein EBP50 regulates microvillar assembly in a phosphorylation-dependent manner</name><description/><dates><release>2010-10-11T11:20:23Z</release><modification>2018-11-29T11:20:23Z</modification><creation>2018-11-29T11:20:23Z</creation></dates><accession>S-JCBD-201004115</accession><cross_references><doi>10.1083/jcb.201004115</doi></cross_references></HashMap>