<HashMap><database>bioimages</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><submitter>Julien Espeut</submitter><journal>The Journal of Cell Biology</journal><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-JCBD-201111107</full_dataset_link><attach_to>JCB</attach_to><legend>Timelapse sequence of one-cell C. elegans embryo expressing GFP::histone H2b and GFP::g-tubulin to mark chromosomes and spindle poles respectively, and KNL-1RR::mCherry 4A mutant (endogenous KNL-1 is depleted). 5 x 2 µm z-sections were acquired every 10s.</legend><legend>Timelapse sequence of one-cell C. elegans embryo expressing GFP::histone H2b and GFP::g-tubulin to mark chromosomes and spindle poles respectively, and KNL-1RR::mCherry wild-type (endogenous KNL-1 is depleted). This is the same image shown in Figure 2C for wild-type KLN-1.  5 x 2 µm z-sections were acquired every 10s.</legend><legend>Timelapse sequence of one-cell C. elegans embryo expressing GFP::histone H2b and GFP::g-tubulin to mark chromosomes and spindle poles respectively, and KNL-1RR::mCherry 4A-RRASA mutant (endogenous KNL-1 is depleted). 5 x 2 µm z-sections were acquired every 10s.</legend><legend>Timelapse sequence of one-cell C. elegans embryo expressing GFP::histone H2b and GFP::g-tubulin to mark chromosomes and spindle poles respectively, and KNL-1RR::mCherry wild-type (endogenous KNL-1 is depleted). This is the same image as shown in Figure 1J.  5 x 2 µm z-sections were acquired every 10s.</legend><legend>Timelapse sequence of one-cell C. elegans embryo expressing GFP::histone H2b and GFP::g-tubulin to mark chromosomes and spindle poles respectively, and KNL-1RR::mCherry RRASA mutant  (endogenous KNL-1 is depleted). 5 x 2 µm z-sections were acquired every 10s.</legend><repository>bioimages</repository><figure_sub>Image 132999 (Figure 2 - C)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 133008 (Figure 2 - C)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 1 - J</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 7 - B</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 133003 (Figure 7 - B)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 7</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 6</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 132998 (Figure 2 - C)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 6 - C</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 132997 (Figure 1 - J)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 1</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 2 - C</figure_sub><figure_sub>Image 133000 (Figure 6 - C)</figure_sub><figure_sub>Figure 2</figure_sub><pubmed_authors>Dhanya K. Cheerambathur</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arshad Desai</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Julien Espeut</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lenno Krenning</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karen Oegema</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Microtubule binding by KNL-1 contributes to spindle checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore</name><description/><dates><release>2012-02-13T11:22:42Z</release><modification>2018-11-29T11:22:42Z</modification><creation>2018-11-29T11:22:42Z</creation></dates><accession>S-JCBD-201111107</accession><cross_references><doi>10.1083/jcb.201111107</doi></cross_references></HashMap>