<HashMap><database>BioModels</database><file_versions><headers><Content-Type>application/xml</Content-Type></headers><body><files><Txt>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=curation_notes.txt</Txt><Pdf>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=BIOMD0000000086.pdf</Pdf><Owl>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=BIOMD0000000086-biopax3.owl</Owl><Owl>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=BIOMD0000000086-biopax2.owl</Owl><Svg>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=BIOMD0000000086.svg</Svg><Xml>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=BIOMD0000000086_url.xml</Xml><Xml>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=manifest.xml</Xml><Other>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=BIOMD0000000086.ode</Other><Other>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=BIOMD0000000086.vcml</Other><Other>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=metadata.rdf</Other><Other>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=BIOMD0000000086.png</Other><Other>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=BIOMD0000000086.m</Other><Other>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=curation_image.png</Other><Other>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=BIOMD0000000086-matlab.m</Other><Other>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=BIOMD0000000086-octave.m</Other><Other>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/model/download/BIOMD0000000086?filename=BIOMD0000000086_url.sedml</Other></files><type>primary</type></body><statusCode>OK</statusCode><statusCodeValue>200</statusCodeValue></file_versions><scores/><additional><submitter>Enuo He</submitter><curationStatus>Manually curated</curationStatus><modellingApproach>ordinary differential equation model</modellingApproach><levelVersion>L2V1</levelVersion><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/BIOMD0000000086</full_dataset_link><publication_pubmed>15520372</publication_pubmed><isPrivate>false</isPrivate><repository>BioModels</repository><modelFormat>SBML</modelFormat><omics_type>Models</omics_type><tokenised_name>Bornheimer2004 GTPaseCycle</tokenised_name><publication_year>2004</publication_year><submissionId>MODEL4822989369</submissionId><publication_authors>Scott J Bornheimer, Mano R Maurya, Marilyn Gist Farquhar, Shankar Subramaniam</publication_authors><first_author>Scott J Bornheimer</first_author><publication>15520372,
                            Heterotrimeric G protein signaling is regulated by signaling modules composed of heterotrimeric G proteins, active G protein-coupled receptors (Rs), which activate G proteins, and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which deactivate G proteins. We term these modules GTPase-cycle modules. The local concentrations of these proteins are spatially regulated between plasma membrane microdomains and between the plasma membrane and cytosol, but no data or models are available that quantitatively explain the effect of such regulation on signaling. We present a computational model of the GTPase-cycle module that predicts that the interplay of local G protein, R, and GAP concentrations gives rise to 16 distinct signaling regimes and numerous intermediate signaling phenomena. The regimes suggest alternative modes of the GTPase-cycle module that occur based on defined local concentrations of the component proteins. In one mode, signaling occurs while G protein and receptor are unclustered and GAP eliminates signaling; in another, G protein and receptor are clustered and GAP can rapidly modulate signaling but does not eliminate it. Experimental data from multiple GTPase-cycle modules is interpreted in light of these predictions. The latter mode explains previously paradoxical data in which GAP does not alter maximal current amplitude of G protein-activated ion channels, but hastens signaling. The predictions indicate how variations in local concentrations of the component proteins create GTPase-cycle modules with distinctive phenotypes. They provide a quantitative framework for investigating how regulation of local concentrations of components of the GTPase-cycle module affects signaling.. 45, 101.
                            Departments of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Medicine, and Bioengineering and San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.</publication><submitter_mail>enuo.he@wolfson.ox.ac.uk</submitter_mail><submitter_affiliation>University of Oxford</submitter_affiliation><publicationId>BIOMD0000000086</publicationId><pubmed_abstract>Heterotrimeric G protein signaling is regulated by signaling modules composed of heterotrimeric G proteins, active G protein-coupled receptors (Rs), which activate G proteins, and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which deactivate G proteins. We term these modules GTPase-cycle modules. The local concentrations of these proteins are spatially regulated between plasma membrane microdomains and between the plasma membrane and cytosol, but no data or models are available that quantitatively explain the effect of such regulation on signaling. We present a computational model of the GTPase-cycle module that predicts that the interplay of local G protein, R, and GAP concentrations gives rise to 16 distinct signaling regimes and numerous intermediate signaling phenomena. The regimes suggest alternative modes of the GTPase-cycle module that occur based on defined local concentrations of the component proteins. In one mode, signaling occurs while G protein and receptor are unclustered and GAP eliminates signaling; in another, G protein and receptor are clustered and GAP can rapidly modulate signaling but does not eliminate it. Experimental data from multiple GTPase-cycle modules is interpreted in light of these predictions. The latter mode explains previously paradoxical data in which GAP does not alter maximal current amplitude of G protein-activated ion channels, but hastens signaling. The predictions indicate how variations in local concentrations of the component proteins create GTPase-cycle modules with distinctive phenotypes. They provide a quantitative framework for investigating how regulation of local concentrations of components of the GTPase-cycle module affects signaling.</pubmed_abstract><pubmed_title>Computational modeling reveals how interplay between components of a GTPase-cycle module regulates signal transduction.</pubmed_title><pubmed_authors>Bornheimer Scott J SJ, Maurya Mano R MR, Farquhar Marilyn Gist MG, Subramaniam Shankar S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Bornheimer2004_GTPaseCycle</name><description>
      
        This model is according to the paper      Computational modeling reveals how interplay between components of a GTPase-cycle module regulates signal transduction
          by Bornheimer et al 2004.The figure 3 is reproduced by Copasi 4.0.19 (development) .It is three-dimensional logarithmic plots show the output of simulations of Z and v at various concentrations of R and GAP.      
            
            To the extent possible under law, all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this encoded model have been dedicated to the public domain worldwide. Please refer to      CC0 Public Domain Dedication
          for more information.      
            In summary, you are entitled to use this encoded model in absolutely any manner you deem suitable, verbatim, or with modification, alone or embedded it in a larger context, redistribute it, commercially or not, in a restricted way or not.
            
            To cite BioModels Database, please use:      Li C, Donizelli M, Rodriguez N, Dharuri H, Endler L, Chelliah V, Li L, He E, Henry A, Stefan MI, Snoep JL, Hucka M, Le Novère N, Laibe C (2010) BioModels Database: An enhanced, curated and annotated resource for published quantitative kinetic models. BMC Syst Biol., 4:92.
                
            
      
    </description><dates><last_modification>2024-08-21</last_modification><publication>2024-09-02</publication><submission>2006-12-11</submission></dates><accession>BIOMD0000000086</accession><cross_references><reactome>REACT_348</reactome><pubmed>15520372</pubmed><chebi>CHEBI:15996</chebi><chebi>CHEBI:18367</chebi><chebi>CHEBI:17552</chebi><biomodels__db>MODEL4822989369</biomodels__db><biomodels__db>BIOMD0000000086</biomodels__db><go>GO:0005623</go><go>GO:0005834</go><go>GO:0008277</go><go>GO:0043235</go><go>GO:0005515</go><go>GO:0005525</go><go>GO:0003924</go><go>GO:0043241</go><go>GO:0032403</go><go>GO:0005102</go><go>GO:0001664</go><kegg__compound>C00044</kegg__compound><kegg__compound>C00035</kegg__compound><taxonomy>131567</taxonomy><interpro>IPR000342</interpro><interpro>IPR000337</interpro></cross_references></HashMap>