<HashMap><database>biostudies-arrayexpress</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Metabolomics</omics_type><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><omics_type>Transcriptomics</omics_type><omics_type>Genomics</omics_type><omics_type>Proteomics</omics_type><submitter>Gregory Franklin</submitter><instrument_platform>Illumina NovaSeq 6000</instrument_platform><study_type>RNA-seq of coding RNA</study_type><organism>Hypericum perforatum</organism><species>Hypericum perforatum</species><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/E-MTAB-15161</full_dataset_link><description>The study was conducted to understand the defense responses of H. perforatum following co-cultivation with A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes through an integrative transcriptomics and metabolomics approach.</description><repository>biostudies-arrayexpress</repository><sample_protocol>Nucleic Acid Extraction - Total RNA was isolated from 100 mg of biomass using the Sigma Spectrum RNA extraction kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). RNA samples with an RNA integrity number (RIN) of at least seven were used for RNAseq analysis.</sample_protocol><sample_protocol>Sample Treatment - A. tumefaciens or A. rhizogenes was added to H. perforatum cell suspension cultures in the exponential phase (three to five days after subculture).</sample_protocol><sample_protocol>Sequencing - After size selection, the double-stranded cDNA was purified by PCR and 150 bp paired-read Illumina sequencing was performed (Novogene, Beijing, China).</sample_protocol><sample_protocol>Sample Collection - After co-cultivation of Agrobacteria and A. tumefaciens, the cells were collected at different time points (0.5 h, 3 h, 12 h, 24 h). After the cells were vacuum filtered from the medium, they were immediately cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C.</sample_protocol><sample_protocol>Growth Protocol - Three biological replicates for the treatment and control were incubated in a growth chamber with a photoperiod of 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness at 25 °C, an irradiation of 80 µmol m-²s-¹ and a relative humidity of 70, and both the treated and control cultures were kept alive.</sample_protocol><sample_protocol>Library Construction - Random hexamer primers were used to synthesise the cDNA after random fragmentation of the mRNA. DNA polymerase I, dNTPs, RNase H and a special second-strand synthesis buffer (Illumina) were used to generate the second strand.</sample_protocol><figure_sub>Organization</figure_sub><figure_sub>MINSEQE Score</figure_sub><figure_sub>Assays and Data</figure_sub><figure_sub>MAGE-TAB Files</figure_sub><pubmed_authors>Maria Nuc</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gregory Franklin</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paweł Krajewski</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rajendran K Selvakesavan</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>RNA-Seq analysis of cell suspension culture of Hypericum perforatum</name><description>The study was conducted to understand the defense responses of H. perforatum following co-cultivation with A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes through an integrative transcriptomics and metabolomics approach.</description><dates><release>2025-09-01T00:00:00Z</release><modification>2025-09-01T12:30:16.26Z</modification><creation>2025-05-21T14:15:48.567Z</creation></dates><accession>E-MTAB-15161</accession><cross_references><ENA>ERP172808</ENA><EFO>EFO_0002944</EFO><EFO>EFO_0004170</EFO><EFO>EFO_0003789</EFO><EFO>EFO_0005518</EFO><EFO>EFO_0003738</EFO><EFO>EFO_0004184</EFO><EFO>EFO_0003969</EFO></cross_references></HashMap>