<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>2023</volume><submitter>Li C</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This evidence mapping is aimed at identifying, summarizing, and analyzing the available evidence on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for neuropathic pain (NP).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This study was conducted following the methodology of Global Evidence Mapping (GEM). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO to identify systematic reviews (SRs) with or without meta-analysis published before February 15, 2022. The authors independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality of the included SRs using AMSTAR-2. The results were presented in the tables and a bubble plot based on the identified population-intervention-comparison-outcome (PICO) questions.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 34 SRs met the eligibility c</pubmed_abstract><journal>Neural plasticity</journal><pagination>2680620</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10041341</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Evidence Mapping Based on Systematic Reviews of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Neuropathic Pain.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10041341</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Yang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ding D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hou W</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Evidence Mapping Based on Systematic Reviews of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Neuropathic Pain.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This evidence mapping is aimed at identifying, summarizing, and analyzing the available evidence on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for neuropathic pain (NP).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This study was conducted following the methodology of Global Evidence Mapping (GEM). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO to identify systematic reviews (SRs) with or without meta-analysis published before February 15, 2022. The authors independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality of the included SRs using AMSTAR-2. The results were presented in the tables and a bubble plot based on the identified population-intervention-comparison-outcome (PICO) questions.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 34 SRs met the eligibility c</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023</publication><modification>2025-04-19T01:44:07.819Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T03:01:54.215Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10041341</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36994240</pubmed><doi>10.1155/2023/2680620</doi></cross_references></HashMap>