<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10</volume><submitter>Curila K</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) produces delayed, unphysiological activation of the right ventricle. Using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography (UHF-ECG), we explored how bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture (aLBBP) affects the resultant ventricular depolarization pattern.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In patients with bradycardia, His bundle pacing (HBP), unipolar nonselective LBBP (nsLBBP), aLBBP, and right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) were performed. Timing of local ventricular activation, in leads V1-V8, was displayed using UHF-ECG, and electrical dyssynchrony (e-DYS) was calculated as the difference between the first and last activation. Durations of local depolarizations were determined as the width of the UHF-QRS complex at 50% of its amplitude.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>aLBBP was feasible in 63 of 75 consecutive patients with successful nsLBBP. aLBBP significantly improved ventricular dyssynchrony (mean -9 ms; 95% CI (-12;-6) vs. -24 ms (-27;-21), ), &lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.001) and shortened local depolarization durations in V1-V4 (mean differences -7 ms to -5 ms (-11;-1), &lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.05) compared to nsLBBP. aLBBP resulted in e-DYS -9 ms (-12; -6) vs. e-DYS 10 ms (7;14), &lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.001 during HBP. Local depolarization durations in V1-V2 during aLBBP were longer than HBP (differences 5-9 ms (1;14), &lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.05, with local depolarization duration in V1 during aLBBP being the same as during RVSP (difference 2 ms (-2;6), &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.52).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Although aLBBP improved ventricular synchrony and depolarization duration of the septum and RV compared to unipolar nsLBBP, the resultant ventricular depolarization was still less physiological than during HBP.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine</journal><pagination>1140988</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10073552</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture preserves physiological ventricular activation better than unipolar left bundle branch pacing.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10073552</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Osmancik P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Curila K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smisek R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kach J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Waldauf P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Halamek J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moskal P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jurak P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Linkova H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leinveber P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tothova M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Poviser L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Prinzen F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vondra V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jastrzebski M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Plesinger F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Viscor I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Znojilova L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture preserves physiological ventricular activation better than unipolar left bundle branch pacing.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) produces delayed, unphysiological activation of the right ventricle. Using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography (UHF-ECG), we explored how bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture (aLBBP) affects the resultant ventricular depolarization pattern.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In patients with bradycardia, His bundle pacing (HBP), unipolar nonselective LBBP (nsLBBP), aLBBP, and right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) were performed. Timing of local ventricular activation, in leads V1-V8, was displayed using UHF-ECG, and electrical dyssynchrony (e-DYS) was calculated as the difference between the first and last activation. Durations of local depolarizations were determined as the width of the UHF-QRS complex at 50% of its amplitude.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>aLBBP was feasible in 63 of 75 consecutive patients with successful nsLBBP. aLBBP significantly improved ventricular dyssynchrony (mean -9 ms; 95% CI (-12;-6) vs. -24 ms (-27;-21), ), &lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.001) and shortened local depolarization durations in V1-V4 (mean differences -7 ms to -5 ms (-11;-1), &lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.05) compared to nsLBBP. aLBBP resulted in e-DYS -9 ms (-12; -6) vs. e-DYS 10 ms (7;14), &lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.001 during HBP. Local depolarization durations in V1-V2 during aLBBP were longer than HBP (differences 5-9 ms (1;14), &lt;i>p&lt;/i> &lt; 0.05, with local depolarization duration in V1 during aLBBP being the same as during RVSP (difference 2 ms (-2;6), &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.52).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Although aLBBP improved ventricular synchrony and depolarization duration of the septum and RV compared to unipolar nsLBBP, the resultant ventricular depolarization was still less physiological than during HBP.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023</publication><modification>2025-04-05T12:19:11.347Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T12:19:11.347Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10073552</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37034324</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fcvm.2023.1140988</doi></cross_references></HashMap>