<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><submitter>Mak SS</submitter><funding>U.S. department of veterans affairs</funding><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>Veterans Health Affairs Office of Rural Health</funding><funding>HSRD VA</funding><funding>National Institute on Aging</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The aim is to pilot a low-touch program for reducing benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA; benzodiazepines, z-drugs) prescriptions among older veterans.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Pilot randomized controlled trial consists of 2,009 veterans aged ≥ 65 years who received BZRA prescriptions from a Veterans Health Administration pharmacy (Colorado or Montana) during the prior 18 months. Active: Arm 1 was a mailed brochure about BZRA risks that also included information about a free, online cognitive behavioral therapy for the insomnia (CBTI) program. Arm 2 was a mailed brochure (same as arm 1) and telephone reinforcement call. Control: Arm 3 was a mailed brochure without insomnia treatment information. Active BZRA prescriptions at follow-up (6 and 12 months) were measured.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In logistic regression analyses, the odds of BZRA prescription at 6- and 12-month follow-ups were not significantly different for arm 1 or 2 (active) versus arm 3 (control), including models adjusted for demographics and prescription characteristics (&lt;i>p&lt;/i>-values >0.36).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Although we observed no differences in active BZRA prescriptions, this pilot study provides guidance for conducting a future study, indicating a need for a more potent intervention. A full-scale trial testing an optimized program would provide conclusive results.&lt;h4>Clinical implications&lt;/h4>Mailing information about BZRA risks and CBTI did not affect BZRA prescriptions.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical gerontologist</journal><pagination>1-12</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10076445</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Pilot RCT Testing A Mailing About Sleeping Pills and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: Impact on Benzodiazepines and Z-Drugs.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10076445</pmcid><funding_grant_id>IK6 HX003160</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>I01 HX002166</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K24 HL143055</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01 AG061239</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kaufmann CN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mak SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fung CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alessi CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ulmer C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McCarthy MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lum HD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martin JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mitchell MN</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Pilot RCT Testing A Mailing About Sleeping Pills and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: Impact on Benzodiazepines and Z-Drugs.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The aim is to pilot a low-touch program for reducing benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA; benzodiazepines, z-drugs) prescriptions among older veterans.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Pilot randomized controlled trial consists of 2,009 veterans aged ≥ 65 years who received BZRA prescriptions from a Veterans Health Administration pharmacy (Colorado or Montana) during the prior 18 months. Active: Arm 1 was a mailed brochure about BZRA risks that also included information about a free, online cognitive behavioral therapy for the insomnia (CBTI) program. Arm 2 was a mailed brochure (same as arm 1) and telephone reinforcement call. Control: Arm 3 was a mailed brochure without insomnia treatment information. Active BZRA prescriptions at follow-up (6 and 12 months) were measured.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In logistic regression analyses, the odds of BZRA prescription at 6- and 12-month follow-ups were not significantly different for arm 1 or 2 (active) versus arm 3 (control), including models adjusted for demographics and prescription characteristics (&lt;i>p&lt;/i>-values >0.36).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Although we observed no differences in active BZRA prescriptions, this pilot study provides guidance for conducting a future study, indicating a need for a more potent intervention. A full-scale trial testing an optimized program would provide conclusive results.&lt;h4>Clinical implications&lt;/h4>Mailing information about BZRA risks and CBTI did not affect BZRA prescriptions.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2025-05-29T14:38:22.058Z</modification><creation>2025-05-29T14:38:22.058Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10076445</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36200403</pubmed><doi>10.1080/07317115.2022.2130849</doi></cross_references></HashMap>