<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Guo R</submitter><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><pagination>230</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10103414</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>23(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The association between sensory impairment including vision impairment (VI), hearing impairment (HI), dual impairment (DI) and the functional limitations of SCD (SCD-related FL) are still unclear in middle-aged and older people.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>162,083 participants from BRFSS in 2019 to 2020 was used in this cross-sectional study. After adjusting the weights, multiple logistic regression was used to study the relationship between sensory impairment and SCD or SCD-related FL. In addition, we performed subgroup analysis on the basis of interaction between sensory impairment and covariates.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Participants who reported sensory impairment were more likely to report SCD or SCD-related FL compared to those without sensory impairment (p &lt; 0.001). The association between dual impairment and SCD-related FL was the strongest, the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were [HI, 2.88 (2.41, 3.43); VI, 3.15(2.61, 3.81); DI, 6.78(5.43, 8.47)] respectively. In addition, subgroup analysis showed that men with sensory impairment were more likely to report SCD-related FL than women, the aORs and 95% CI were [HI, 3.15(2.48, 3.99) vs2.69(2.09, 3.46); VI,3.67(2.79, 4.83) vs. 2.86(2.22, 3.70); DI, 9.07(6.67, 12.35) vs. 5.03(3.72, 6.81)] respectively. The subject of married with dual impairment had a stronger association with SCD-related FL than unmarried subjects the aOR and 95% CI was [9.58(6.69, 13.71) vs. 5.33(4.14, 6.87)].&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Sensory impairment was strongly associated with SCD and SCD-related FL. Individuals with dual impairment had the greatest possibility to reported SCD-related FL, and the association was stronger for men or married subjects than other subjects.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC geriatrics</journal><pubmed_title>Vision impairment, hearing impairment and functional Limitations of subjective cognitive decline: a population-based study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10103414</pmcid><funding_grant_id>81973129</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Li X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sun M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yao N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xie Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guo R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jin L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Vision impairment, hearing impairment and functional Limitations of subjective cognitive decline: a population-based study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The association between sensory impairment including vision impairment (VI), hearing impairment (HI), dual impairment (DI) and the functional limitations of SCD (SCD-related FL) are still unclear in middle-aged and older people.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>162,083 participants from BRFSS in 2019 to 2020 was used in this cross-sectional study. After adjusting the weights, multiple logistic regression was used to study the relationship between sensory impairment and SCD or SCD-related FL. In addition, we performed subgroup analysis on the basis of interaction between sensory impairment and covariates.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Participants who reported sensory impairment were more likely to report SCD or SCD-related FL compared to those without sensory impairment (p &lt; 0.001). The association between dual impairment and SCD-related FL was the strongest, the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were [HI, 2.88 (2.41, 3.43); VI, 3.15(2.61, 3.81); DI, 6.78(5.43, 8.47)] respectively. In addition, subgroup analysis showed that men with sensory impairment were more likely to report SCD-related FL than women, the aORs and 95% CI were [HI, 3.15(2.48, 3.99) vs2.69(2.09, 3.46); VI,3.67(2.79, 4.83) vs. 2.86(2.22, 3.70); DI, 9.07(6.67, 12.35) vs. 5.03(3.72, 6.81)] respectively. The subject of married with dual impairment had a stronger association with SCD-related FL than unmarried subjects the aOR and 95% CI was [9.58(6.69, 13.71) vs. 5.33(4.14, 6.87)].&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Sensory impairment was strongly associated with SCD and SCD-related FL. Individuals with dual impairment had the greatest possibility to reported SCD-related FL, and the association was stronger for men or married subjects than other subjects.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Apr</publication><modification>2025-05-18T11:12:20.049Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T03:59:58.758Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10103414</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37060058</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12877-023-03950-x</doi></cross_references></HashMap>