<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zhou L</submitter><funding>National Nature Science Foundation of China</funding><pagination>382-389</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10103561</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>25(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>Although several studies have proved that repeat catheter ablation is beneficial to recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT)/atrial fibrillation (AF) after AF catheter ablation, the hard endpoints of the effect of catheter ablation on recurrent AT/AF patients after AF catheter ablation remains unclear. Our study aims to compare the effect of catheter ablation and drug therapy on recurrent AT/AF patients after AF catheter ablation.&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>Four thousand nine hundred and thirteen consecutive patients with recurrent AT/AF after catheter ablation from the China-AF registry were enrolled. The patients were divided into two study groups: the repeat catheter ablation group and the medical therapy group. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular mortality or is</pubmed_abstract><journal>Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology</journal><pubmed_title>Effect of repeat catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy among patients with recurrent atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: data from CHINA-AF registry.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10103561</pmcid><funding_grant_id>82103904</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Long D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yu R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sang C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Du X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ma C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dong J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tang R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jiang C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effect of repeat catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy among patients with recurrent atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: data from CHINA-AF registry.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>Although several studies have proved that repeat catheter ablation is beneficial to recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT)/atrial fibrillation (AF) after AF catheter ablation, the hard endpoints of the effect of catheter ablation on recurrent AT/AF patients after AF catheter ablation remains unclear. Our study aims to compare the effect of catheter ablation and drug therapy on recurrent AT/AF patients after AF catheter ablation.&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>Four thousand nine hundred and thirteen consecutive patients with recurrent AT/AF after catheter ablation from the China-AF registry were enrolled. The patients were divided into two study groups: the repeat catheter ablation group and the medical therapy group. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular mortality or is</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-04T12:43:45.829Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T12:43:45.829Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10103561</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36156137</pubmed><doi>10.1093/europace/euac169</doi></cross_references></HashMap>