<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Xu L</submitter><funding>the Wenzhou Municipal Technological Innovation Program of High-level Talents</funding><funding>the Key Innovation and Guidance Program of the Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology &amp; Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University</funding><funding>the Key R&amp;D Program of Zhejiang</funding><funding>the Zhejiang Provincial National Science Foundation of China</funding><funding>the Health Commission of Zhejiang Province</funding><funding>the Zhejiang Health Innovation Talents Program</funding><funding>the National Key R&amp;D Program of China</funding><funding>the National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><pagination>366-370</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10106402</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Glaucoma is one of the most common optic neuropathies, featuring progressive retinal ganglion cell damage and visual field loss (Tham et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2020). Currently, the only effective treatment for this condition is the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) (Palmberg, 2001; Heijl et al., 2002). Canaloplasty is a proven bleb-independent surgery with good efficacy and safety profiles in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (Gołaszewska et al., 2021). However, early transient postoperative IOP elevation has been reported in up to 30% of cases (Riva et al., 2019), similar to that commonly observed in other internal drainage glaucoma surgeries such as implantation using iStent (0%-21.0%), CyPass (10.8%), and Hydrus (4.8%-6.5%) (Lavia et al., 2017). This complication may be a predict</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B</journal><pubmed_title>Incidence and risk factors of early transient intraocular pressure elevation after canaloplasty for primary open-angle glaucoma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10106402</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2023KY914</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2020YFC2008200</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>YNZD2201903</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2022C03112</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2016025</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>LQ18H120010</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>604090352/577</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>82201177</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Xu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cao Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ye W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ren R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Incidence and risk factors of early transient intraocular pressure elevation after canaloplasty for primary open-angle glaucoma.</name><description>Glaucoma is one of the most common optic neuropathies, featuring progressive retinal ganglion cell damage and visual field loss (Tham et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2020). Currently, the only effective treatment for this condition is the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) (Palmberg, 2001; Heijl et al., 2002). Canaloplasty is a proven bleb-independent surgery with good efficacy and safety profiles in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (Gołaszewska et al., 2021). However, early transient postoperative IOP elevation has been reported in up to 30% of cases (Riva et al., 2019), similar to that commonly observed in other internal drainage glaucoma surgeries such as implantation using iStent (0%-21.0%), CyPass (10.8%), and Hydrus (4.8%-6.5%) (Lavia et al., 2017). This complication may be a predict</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-18T15:01:50.983Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T01:29:27.489Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10106402</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37056213</pubmed><doi>10.1631/jzus.b2200485</doi><doi>10.1631/jzus.B2200485</doi></cross_references></HashMap>