<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>110(3)</volume><submitter>Kragh N</submitter><funding>Swedish Orphan Biovitrum</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The economic and clinical burden of haemophilia A is high. Primary prophylaxis with factor VIII replacement therapy is the recognised standard of care, but the emergence of non-factor therapies, such as emicizumab, is extending treatment options for people with haemophilia A.&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>There are currently no direct comparisons of efficacy or cost between recombinant factor FVIII Fc-fusion protein efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor FVIII Fc-fusion protein referred to herein as rFVIIIFc) and emicizumab; therefore, a cost-effectiveness model was developed to compare prophylactic treatment with rFVIIIFc versus emicizumab in patients with haemophilia A without inhibitors in the UK.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The cost-effectiveness model was based on a matching-adjusted indirect c</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of haematology</journal><pagination>262-270</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10107896</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Cost-effectiveness of recombinant factor VIII Fc versus emicizumab for prophylaxis in adults and adolescents with haemophilia A without inhibitors in the UK.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10107896</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Pochopien M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aballea S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tytula A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kragh N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Toumi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bystricka L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fatoye F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nazir J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hakimi Z</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Cost-effectiveness of recombinant factor VIII Fc versus emicizumab for prophylaxis in adults and adolescents with haemophilia A without inhibitors in the UK.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The economic and clinical burden of haemophilia A is high. Primary prophylaxis with factor VIII replacement therapy is the recognised standard of care, but the emergence of non-factor therapies, such as emicizumab, is extending treatment options for people with haemophilia A.&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>There are currently no direct comparisons of efficacy or cost between recombinant factor FVIII Fc-fusion protein efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor FVIII Fc-fusion protein referred to herein as rFVIIIFc) and emicizumab; therefore, a cost-effectiveness model was developed to compare prophylactic treatment with rFVIIIFc versus emicizumab in patients with haemophilia A without inhibitors in the UK.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The cost-effectiveness model was based on a matching-adjusted indirect c</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-04T20:46:02.994Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T20:46:02.994Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10107896</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36398467</pubmed><doi>10.1111/ejh.13901</doi></cross_references></HashMap>