<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>20(1)</volume><submitter>Houghton N</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>In May 2020, first-year students at Imperial College School of Medicine attended a 'digital hospital placement'. Occurring in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, this replaced their first planned hospital placement. The authors analysed student experiences to understand how a digital hospital placement impacted self-perceived clinical and professional development and whether it improved preparedness for face-to-face hospital placements.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Three hundred ten students participated in this week-long digital placement, which integrated clinical skills, communication and professional behaviour domains. It aimed to prepare students for safe participation in clinical environments. Resources included self-directed and peer learning, virtual simulations (Oxford Medical Simulation) and staff-led debriefing. Surveys were administered after the digital placement and after students' first face-to-face placement to collect quantitative and qualitative data. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Eighty-three and twenty-nine students completed the postdigital and post-face-to-face placement evaluation respectively. Quantitative results indicated a high self-rated achievement of learning objectives and enthusiasm for digital placements; 83% of respondents supported digital simulations as part of regular medical education. Qualitative analysis identified three superordinate themes: (1) domain integration in digital placements helped students feel better prepared; (2) digital experiential learning is ideally suited to early clinical learning; and (3) virtual placements are a compliment, not an alternative, to face-to-face placements.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Digital placements are a promising means of supporting the challenging transition from classroom learner to clinical learner. They provide a feasible and scalable option for building student confidence and improving preparedness.</pubmed_abstract><journal>The clinical teacher</journal><pagination>e13558</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10108031</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Digital clinical placements: Student perspectives and preparedness for placements.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10108031</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Baptista A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dharmarajah A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thakerar V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Houghton N</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Digital clinical placements: Student perspectives and preparedness for placements.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>In May 2020, first-year students at Imperial College School of Medicine attended a 'digital hospital placement'. Occurring in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, this replaced their first planned hospital placement. The authors analysed student experiences to understand how a digital hospital placement impacted self-perceived clinical and professional development and whether it improved preparedness for face-to-face hospital placements.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Three hundred ten students participated in this week-long digital placement, which integrated clinical skills, communication and professional behaviour domains. It aimed to prepare students for safe participation in clinical environments. Resources included self-directed and peer learning, virtual simulations (Oxford Medical Simulation) and staff-led debriefing. Surveys were administered after the digital placement and after students' first face-to-face placement to collect quantitative and qualitative data. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Eighty-three and twenty-nine students completed the postdigital and post-face-to-face placement evaluation respectively. Quantitative results indicated a high self-rated achievement of learning objectives and enthusiasm for digital placements; 83% of respondents supported digital simulations as part of regular medical education. Qualitative analysis identified three superordinate themes: (1) domain integration in digital placements helped students feel better prepared; (2) digital experiential learning is ideally suited to early clinical learning; and (3) virtual placements are a compliment, not an alternative, to face-to-face placements.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Digital placements are a promising means of supporting the challenging transition from classroom learner to clinical learner. They provide a feasible and scalable option for building student confidence and improving preparedness.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-26T04:58:00.7Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T11:22:17.801Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10108031</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36599293</pubmed><doi>10.1111/tct.13558</doi></cross_references></HashMap>