<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>57(16)</volume><submitter>Jung S</submitter><funding>Manufacturing Futures Institute, Carnegie Mellon University</funding><funding>Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development</funding><pubmed_abstract>The manufacturing sector accounts for a large percentage of global energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, and there is growing interest in the potential of additive manufacturing (AM) to reduce the sector's environmental impacts. Across multiple industries, AM has been used to reduce material use in final parts by 35-80%, and recent publications have predicted that AM will enable the fabrication of customized products locally and on-demand, reducing shipping and material waste. In many contexts, however, AM is not a viable alternative to traditional manufacturing methods due to its high production costs. And in high-volume mass production, AM can lead to increased energy use and material waste, worsening environmental impacts compared to traditional production methods. Whether AM is an e</pubmed_abstract><journal>Environmental science &amp; technology</journal><pagination>6373-6386</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10134501</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Is Additive Manufacturing an Environmentally and Economically Preferred Alternative for Mass Production?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10134501</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Whitefoot KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nie Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jung S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kara LB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simpson TW</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Is Additive Manufacturing an Environmentally and Economically Preferred Alternative for Mass Production?</name><description>The manufacturing sector accounts for a large percentage of global energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, and there is growing interest in the potential of additive manufacturing (AM) to reduce the sector's environmental impacts. Across multiple industries, AM has been used to reduce material use in final parts by 35-80%, and recent publications have predicted that AM will enable the fabrication of customized products locally and on-demand, reducing shipping and material waste. In many contexts, however, AM is not a viable alternative to traditional manufacturing methods due to its high production costs. And in high-volume mass production, AM can lead to increased energy use and material waste, worsening environmental impacts compared to traditional production methods. Whether AM is an e</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-04T11:05:31.588Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T11:05:31.588Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10134501</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37066969</pubmed><doi>10.1021/acs.est.2c04927</doi></cross_references></HashMap>