<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>128(10)</volume><submitter>Kuboki Y</submitter><funding>Taiho Pharmaceutical</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>This open-label, multicentre, phase II/III trial assessed the noninferiority of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab vs. fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (control) as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive FTD/TPI (35 mg/m&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> twice daily, days 1-5 and days 8-12, 28-day cycle) plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, days 1 and 15) or control. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The noninferiority margin of the hazard ratio (HR) was set to 1.33.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Overall, 397 patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Median OS was 14.8 vs. 18.1 months (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control; HR 1.38; 95% confidence interva</pubmed_abstract><journal>British journal of cancer</journal><pagination>1897-1905</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10147634</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan+BEV as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised noninferiority trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10147634</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kawakami H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Masuishi T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ojima H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakamura M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Takenaka N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakajima TE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Takashima A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morita S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ozawa D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kotaka M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuboki Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Watanabe J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kagawa Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sunakawa Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taniguchi H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hara H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oki E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Makiyama A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kajiwara T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Terazawa T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ishihara S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shirao K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sugimoto N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yoshino T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan+BEV as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised noninferiority trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>This open-label, multicentre, phase II/III trial assessed the noninferiority of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab vs. fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (control) as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive FTD/TPI (35 mg/m&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> twice daily, days 1-5 and days 8-12, 28-day cycle) plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, days 1 and 15) or control. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The noninferiority margin of the hazard ratio (HR) was set to 1.33.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Overall, 397 patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Median OS was 14.8 vs. 18.1 months (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control; HR 1.38; 95% confidence interva</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 May</publication><modification>2025-04-26T01:28:54.617Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T02:55:58.06Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10147634</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36871043</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41416-023-02212-2</doi></cross_references></HashMap>