<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Crockett S</submitter><funding>HRUK</funding><funding>British Heart Foundation</funding><funding>Maurice &amp;amp; Phyllis Paykel Trust</funding><funding>J.P Moulton Charitable Foundation</funding><pagination>e067605</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10151986</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) carries a 3%-6.1% stroke risk, including risk of 'silent' cerebral infarction (SCI). Stent-grafts are manufactured in room air and retain air. Instructions for use recommend saline flushing to 'de-air' the system prior to insertion, but substantial amounts of air are released when deploying them, potentially leading to downstream neuronal injury and SCI. Carbon dioxide (CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>) is more dense and more soluble in blood than air, without risk of bubble formation, so could be used in addition to saline to de-air stents. This pilot trial aims to assess the feasibility of a full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the neuroprotective benefit against SCI with the use of CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>-flushed aortic stent-g</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pubmed_title>Carbon dioxide flushing versus saline flushing of thoracic aortic stents (INTERCEPTevar): protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10151986</pmcid><funding_grant_id>N/A</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P79851</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>FS/17/24/32596</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RG2684/19/22</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Gunning S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Crockett S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singh A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sallam M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bicknell C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lyons O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamady M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nicholas R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gibbs R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hanna L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Modarai B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abisi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gable D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Carbon dioxide flushing versus saline flushing of thoracic aortic stents (INTERCEPTevar): protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) carries a 3%-6.1% stroke risk, including risk of 'silent' cerebral infarction (SCI). Stent-grafts are manufactured in room air and retain air. Instructions for use recommend saline flushing to 'de-air' the system prior to insertion, but substantial amounts of air are released when deploying them, potentially leading to downstream neuronal injury and SCI. Carbon dioxide (CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>) is more dense and more soluble in blood than air, without risk of bubble formation, so could be used in addition to saline to de-air stents. This pilot trial aims to assess the feasibility of a full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the neuroprotective benefit against SCI with the use of CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>-flushed aortic stent-g</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Apr</publication><modification>2026-05-28T11:50:32.315Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T03:19:02.141Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10151986</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37105705</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067605</doi></cross_references></HashMap>