<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Cope LM</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIAAA NIH HHS</funding><pagination>114112</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10153473</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>436</volume><pubmed_abstract>Cue-based associative learning (i.e., Pavlovian conditioning) is a foundational component of behavior in almost all forms of animal life and may provide insight into individual differences in addiction liability. Cues can take on incentive-motivational properties (i.e., incentive salience) through Pavlovian learning. Extensive testing with non-human animals (primarily rats) has demonstrated significant variation among individuals in the behaviors this type of learning evokes. So-named "sign-trackers" and "goal-trackers" have been examined in many studies of non-human animals, but this work in humans is still a nascent area of research. In the present proof-of-concept study, we used a Pavlovian conditioned approach task to investigate human sign- and goal-tracking in emerging adults. Conditioned behaviors that developed over the course of the task were directed toward the reward-cue and toward the reward location. Participants' eye-gaze and behavior during the task were submitted to a latent profile analysis, which revealed three groups defined as sign-trackers (n = 10), goal-trackers (n = 4), and intermediate responders (n = 36). Impulsivity was a significant predictor of the sign-tracking group relative to the goal-tracking group. The present study provides preliminary evidence that a simple procedure can produce learned Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior in humans. Though further investigation is required, findings provide a promising step toward the long-term goal of translating important insights gleaned from basic research into treatment strategies that can be applied to clinical populations.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Behavioural brain research</journal><pubmed_title>A mechanical task for measuring sign- and goal-tracking in humans: A proof-of-concept study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10153473</pmcid><funding_grant_id>K01 DA044270</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR002240</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 DA037844</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 DK020572</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K23 MH109762</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01 DA055068</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01 AA027558</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 DA007268</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Gheidi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Duval ER</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allerton T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cope LM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morrow JD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khalil H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martz ME</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A mechanical task for measuring sign- and goal-tracking in humans: A proof-of-concept study.</name><description>Cue-based associative learning (i.e., Pavlovian conditioning) is a foundational component of behavior in almost all forms of animal life and may provide insight into individual differences in addiction liability. Cues can take on incentive-motivational properties (i.e., incentive salience) through Pavlovian learning. Extensive testing with non-human animals (primarily rats) has demonstrated significant variation among individuals in the behaviors this type of learning evokes. So-named "sign-trackers" and "goal-trackers" have been examined in many studies of non-human animals, but this work in humans is still a nascent area of research. In the present proof-of-concept study, we used a Pavlovian conditioned approach task to investigate human sign- and goal-tracking in emerging adults. Conditioned behaviors that developed over the course of the task were directed toward the reward-cue and toward the reward location. Participants' eye-gaze and behavior during the task were submitted to a latent profile analysis, which revealed three groups defined as sign-trackers (n = 10), goal-trackers (n = 4), and intermediate responders (n = 36). Impulsivity was a significant predictor of the sign-tracking group relative to the goal-tracking group. The present study provides preliminary evidence that a simple procedure can produce learned Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior in humans. Though further investigation is required, findings provide a promising step toward the long-term goal of translating important insights gleaned from basic research into treatment strategies that can be applied to clinical populations.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-04T00:04:00.918Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T00:04:00.918Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10153473</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36115435</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114112</doi></cross_references></HashMap>