<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>28(5)</volume><submitter>Fonseca R</submitter><funding>Janssen Global Services, LLC</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Because patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) do not always receive any treatment beyond first-line (1L) therapy, it is imperative that patients receive the best treatment in the 1L setting. However, the optimal initial treatment remains to be identified. We performed a clinical simulation to assess potential outcomes with different treatment sequences.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>We used a partitioned survival model to compare overall survival (OS) with (1) daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-Rd) in 1L followed by a pomalidomide- or carfilzomib-based regimen in second line (2L) versus (2) bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) in 1L followed by a daratumumab-based regimen in 2L versus (3) lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in 1L followed by a daratumumab-based regimen in 2L. Probabilities of transition between health states (1L, 2L+, and death) were based on published clinical data and real-world data from the Flatiron Health database. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment after 1L (attrition rates) in the base case was estimated with a binomial logistic model using data from the MAIA trial.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Using D-Rd in 1L conferred a longer median OS compared with delaying daratumumab-based regimens until 2L after VRd or Rd, respectively (8.9 [95% CrI 7.58-10.42] vs. 6.92 [5.92-8.33] or 5.75 [4.50-7.25] years). Results of scenario analyses were consistent with the base case.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Our simulation, which incorporates clinically representative treatments and attrition rates, supports the use of D-Rd as initial therapy, rather than delaying the use of daratumumab until later lines of therapy, in patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM.</pubmed_abstract><journal>The oncologist</journal><pagination>e263-e269</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10166176</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Impact of Treatment Sequencing on Overall Survival in Patients with Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Myeloma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10166176</pmcid><pubmed_authors>He J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lam A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fonseca R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hashim M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wildgust M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Facon T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ammann E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nair S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kumar S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Impact of Treatment Sequencing on Overall Survival in Patients with Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Myeloma.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Because patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) do not always receive any treatment beyond first-line (1L) therapy, it is imperative that patients receive the best treatment in the 1L setting. However, the optimal initial treatment remains to be identified. We performed a clinical simulation to assess potential outcomes with different treatment sequences.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>We used a partitioned survival model to compare overall survival (OS) with (1) daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-Rd) in 1L followed by a pomalidomide- or carfilzomib-based regimen in second line (2L) versus (2) bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) in 1L followed by a daratumumab-based regimen in 2L versus (3) lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in 1L followed by a daratumumab-based regimen in 2L. Probabilities of transition between health states (1L, 2L+, and death) were based on published clinical data and real-world data from the Flatiron Health database. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment after 1L (attrition rates) in the base case was estimated with a binomial logistic model using data from the MAIA trial.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Using D-Rd in 1L conferred a longer median OS compared with delaying daratumumab-based regimens until 2L after VRd or Rd, respectively (8.9 [95% CrI 7.58-10.42] vs. 6.92 [5.92-8.33] or 5.75 [4.50-7.25] years). Results of scenario analyses were consistent with the base case.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Our simulation, which incorporates clinically representative treatments and attrition rates, supports the use of D-Rd as initial therapy, rather than delaying the use of daratumumab until later lines of therapy, in patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 May</publication><modification>2025-04-04T13:51:37.341Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T13:51:37.341Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10166176</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37002943</pubmed><doi>10.1093/oncolo/oyad053</doi></cross_references></HashMap>