<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Morado J</submitter><funding>AstraZeneca</funding><funding>Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council</funding><pagination>2810-2827</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10170518</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>63(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>We present a comparative study that evaluates the performance of a machine learning potential (ANI-2x), a conventional force field (GAFF), and an optimally tuned GAFF-like force field in the modeling of a set of 10 γ-fluorohydrins that exhibit a complex interplay between intra- and intermolecular interactions in determining conformer stability. To benchmark the performance of each molecular model, we evaluated their energetic, geometric, and sampling accuracies relative to quantum-mechanical data. This benchmark involved conformational analysis both in the gas phase and chloroform solution. We also assessed the performance of the aforementioned molecular models in estimating nuclear spin-spin coupling constants by comparing their predictions to experimental data available in chloroform. Th</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of chemical information and modeling</journal><pubmed_title>Does a Machine-Learned Potential Perform Better Than an Optimally Tuned Traditional Force Field? A Case Study on Fluorohydrins.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10170518</pmcid><funding_grant_id>EP/L015722/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>EP/P020275/1</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Nissink JWM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Skylaris CK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Essex JW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mortenson PN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morado J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Does a Machine-Learned Potential Perform Better Than an Optimally Tuned Traditional Force Field? A Case Study on Fluorohydrins.</name><description>We present a comparative study that evaluates the performance of a machine learning potential (ANI-2x), a conventional force field (GAFF), and an optimally tuned GAFF-like force field in the modeling of a set of 10 γ-fluorohydrins that exhibit a complex interplay between intra- and intermolecular interactions in determining conformer stability. To benchmark the performance of each molecular model, we evaluated their energetic, geometric, and sampling accuracies relative to quantum-mechanical data. This benchmark involved conformational analysis both in the gas phase and chloroform solution. We also assessed the performance of the aforementioned molecular models in estimating nuclear spin-spin coupling constants by comparing their predictions to experimental data available in chloroform. Th</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 May</publication><modification>2025-04-20T02:53:38.812Z</modification><creation>2024-12-03T21:25:38.09Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10170518</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37071825</pubmed><doi>10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01510</doi></cross_references></HashMap>