<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>49(2)</volume><submitter>Dankelman LHM</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>The use of computed tomography (CT) in fractures is time consuming, challenging and suffers from poor inter-surgeon reliability. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), may overcome shortcomings and reduce clinical burdens to detect and classify fractures. The aim of this review was to summarize literature on CNNs for the detection and classification of fractures on CT scans, focusing on its accuracy and to evaluate the beneficial role in daily practice.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Literature search was performed according to the PRISMA statement, and Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar databases were searched. Studies were eligible when the use of AI for the detect</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society</journal><pagination>681-691</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10175338</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Artificial intelligence fracture recognition on computed tomography: review of literature and recommendations.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10175338</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Jeray K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nelissen R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Poolman R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gordon M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jutte P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guyatt G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tornetta P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Court-Brown C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doornberg JN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dankelman LHM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jaarsma R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moran M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walter SD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Machine Learning Consortium</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ring D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sprague S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>IJpma FFA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McQueen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Groot O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wijffels M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wijffels MME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kerkhoffs G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doornberg J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Obdeijn M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Petrisor B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stirler V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hintermann B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schwab J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Colaris JW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Algra P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sanders D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schoolmeesters B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bzovsky S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walenkamp M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van den Bekerom M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Swiontkowski M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Prijs J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Colaris J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bongers M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gravesteijn B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oberai T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Langerhuizen D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oosterhoff JHF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Steyerberg E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bhandari M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mulders M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schipper I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goslings JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>IJpma F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buijze G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Keijser L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Duckworth A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mallee W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Verhofstad MHJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laane C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hofstee DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schep N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hendrickx L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schemitsch EH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schilstra S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karhade A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olczak J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Janssen S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bulstra AE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lans J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Artificial intelligence fracture recognition on computed tomography: review of literature and recommendations.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>The use of computed tomography (CT) in fractures is time consuming, challenging and suffers from poor inter-surgeon reliability. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), may overcome shortcomings and reduce clinical burdens to detect and classify fractures. The aim of this review was to summarize literature on CNNs for the detection and classification of fractures on CT scans, focusing on its accuracy and to evaluate the beneficial role in daily practice.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Literature search was performed according to the PRISMA statement, and Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar databases were searched. Studies were eligible when the use of AI for the detect</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-22T14:40:21.7Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T01:08:01.137Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10175338</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36284017</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00068-022-02128-1</doi></cross_references></HashMap>