<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(1)</volume><submitter>Wohl DS</submitter><funding>Chiesi Foundation</funding><funding>Universitätsklinikum Regensburg</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Graft rejection and chronic CNI toxicity remain obstacles to organ transplant success. Current formulations of tacrolimus, such as Prograf® and Advagraf™, exhibit limitations in terms of pharmacokinetics and tolerability, related in part to suboptimal bioavailability. As dosing non-compliance can result in graft rejection, the once daily formulation of tacrolimus, Advagraf™, was developed (vs 2x/day Prograf®). Benefits of Advagraf™ are counterbalanced by delayed achievement of therapeutic trough levels and need for up to 50% higher doses to maintain Prograf®-equivalent troughs. Envarsus® is also a prolonged-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation, developed using MeltDose™ drug-delivery technology to increase drug bioavailability; improved bioavailability results in lo</pubmed_abstract><journal>Trials</journal><pagination>325</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10176804</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10176804</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Gotz M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Braun F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vondran FWR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Geissler EK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>James B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holub-Hayles I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pratschke J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>EnGraft Trial Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Herden U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mittler J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Croner R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brennfleck F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schnitzbauer AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vogel T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wohl DS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Willuweit K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berg T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mutzbauer I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schlitt HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brunner SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nadalin S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baccar S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Merle U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neumann UP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rauchfuß F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Graft rejection and chronic CNI toxicity remain obstacles to organ transplant success. Current formulations of tacrolimus, such as Prograf® and Advagraf™, exhibit limitations in terms of pharmacokinetics and tolerability, related in part to suboptimal bioavailability. As dosing non-compliance can result in graft rejection, the once daily formulation of tacrolimus, Advagraf™, was developed (vs 2x/day Prograf®). Benefits of Advagraf™ are counterbalanced by delayed achievement of therapeutic trough levels and need for up to 50% higher doses to maintain Prograf®-equivalent troughs. Envarsus® is also a prolonged-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation, developed using MeltDose™ drug-delivery technology to increase drug bioavailability; improved bioavailability results in lo</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 May</publication><modification>2025-04-04T20:00:15.935Z</modification><creation>2024-11-13T02:32:11.401Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10176804</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37170284</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13063-023-07344-7</doi></cross_references></HashMap>