{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Rooney AG"],"funding":["Medical Research Foundation","Brain Tumour Charity","Medical Research Council","MRF_","The Brain Tumour Charity"],"pagination":["249-260"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10180387"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["10(3)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>There are no effective treatments for brain tumor-related fatigue. We studied the feasibility of two novel lifestyle coaching interventions in fatigued brain tumor patients.<h4>Methods</h4>This phase I/feasibility multi-center RCT recruited patients with a clinically stable primary brain tumor and significant fatigue (mean Brief Fatigue Inventory [BFI] score ≥ 4/10). Participants were randomized in a 1-1-1 allocation ratio to: Control (usual care); Health Coaching (\"HC\", an eight-week program targeting lifestyle behaviors); or HC plus Activation Coaching (\"HC + AC\", further targeting self-efficacy). The primary outcome was feasibility of recruitment and retention. Secondary outcomes were intervention acceptability, which was evaluated via qualitative interview, and safet"],"journal":["Neuro-oncology practice"],"pubmed_title":["Lifestyle coaching is feasible in fatigued brain tumor patients: A phase I/feasibility, multi-center, mixed-methods randomized controlled trial."],"pmcid":["PMC10180387"],"funding_grant_id":["GN000436","MR/J000914/1","C0396","GN-000436"],"pubmed_authors":["Grant R","Hill R","Carruthers J","Day J","Rooney AG","Clark A","Bulbeck H","Mackinnon M","Wells M","Walker A","Gillespie D","Chalmers AJ","Hewins W","Dunlop J","Emerson J","Withington L","Hewitt C","Hopcroft LEM","Cochrane C","Dyson A","McBain C","Robson S","Torrens C","Anderson G","Welsh M","Molinari E"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Lifestyle coaching is feasible in fatigued brain tumor patients: A phase I/feasibility, multi-center, mixed-methods randomized controlled trial.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>There are no effective treatments for brain tumor-related fatigue. We studied the feasibility of two novel lifestyle coaching interventions in fatigued brain tumor patients.<h4>Methods</h4>This phase I/feasibility multi-center RCT recruited patients with a clinically stable primary brain tumor and significant fatigue (mean Brief Fatigue Inventory [BFI] score ≥ 4/10). Participants were randomized in a 1-1-1 allocation ratio to: Control (usual care); Health Coaching (\"HC\", an eight-week program targeting lifestyle behaviors); or HC plus Activation Coaching (\"HC + AC\", further targeting self-efficacy). The primary outcome was feasibility of recruitment and retention. Secondary outcomes were intervention acceptability, which was evaluated via qualitative interview, and safet","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023 Jun","modification":"2026-07-14T17:01:07.48Z","creation":"2025-04-05T09:11:35.449Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC10180387","cross_references":{"pubmed":["37188163"],"doi":["10.1093/nop/npac086"]}}