<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><submitter>Woods SW</submitter><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>Wellcome Trust</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>To harmonize two ascertainment and severity rating instruments commonly used for the clinical high risk syndrome for psychosis (CHR-P): the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The initial workshop is described in the companion report from Addington et al. After the workshop, lead experts for each instrument continued harmonizing attenuated positive symptoms and criteria for psychosis and CHR-P through an intensive series of joint videoconferences.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Full harmonization was achieved for attenuated positive symptom ratings and psychosis criteria, and partial harmonization for CHR-P criteria. The semi-structured interview, named P ositive SY mptoms and Diagnostic Cri</pubmed_abstract><journal>medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences</journal><pagination>2023.04.29.23289226</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10187348</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Development of the PSYCHS: Positive SYmptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10187348</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U01 MH124639</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 MH124631</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 MH124629</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kahn RS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shenton ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Addington J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kerr MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bearden CE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adery LL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahmed U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Woods SW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kinney KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mourgues-Codern C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fusar-Poli P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McGlashan TH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yung AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huynh K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ellman LM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Calkins ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brummitt K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nelson B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Parker S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anticevic A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Perez J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schiffman J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McGorry PD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kane JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nunez AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Billah T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Prunier N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Szacilo J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Perkins DO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haidar A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coleman MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hendricks L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ali M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bouix S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Trankler C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mamah D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walsh BC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buccilli K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Colton BL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Corcoran CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wijtenburg SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Powers AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Accelerating Medicines Partnership Schizophrenia</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Development of the PSYCHS: Positive SYmptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>To harmonize two ascertainment and severity rating instruments commonly used for the clinical high risk syndrome for psychosis (CHR-P): the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The initial workshop is described in the companion report from Addington et al. After the workshop, lead experts for each instrument continued harmonizing attenuated positive symptoms and criteria for psychosis and CHR-P through an intensive series of joint videoconferences.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Full harmonization was achieved for attenuated positive symptom ratings and psychosis criteria, and partial harmonization for CHR-P criteria. The semi-structured interview, named P ositive SY mptoms and Diagnostic Cri</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 May</publication><modification>2025-04-03T22:22:35.825Z</modification><creation>2024-10-15T20:04:22.919Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10187348</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37205422</pubmed><doi>10.1101/2023.04.29.23289226</doi></cross_references></HashMap>