<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>23(4)</volume><submitter>Sachdev PK</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To develop and validate a Dental Nutrition Knowledge Competency Scale to assess dental health-related nutrition knowledge of low-income women.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>This is a cross-sectional study. A literature search for foods/dietary practices related to dental caries was conducted and the items were incorporated into an initial questionnaire. A panel of ten nutrition experts evaluated it for its content, readability and relevance, and a focus group of six low-income women determined its readability and comprehension. Then the questionnaire was administered to 150 low-income women. Construct validity was evaluated by item difficulty, item discrimination and factor analysis. Internal consistency reliability was tested via Cronbach's α. In a sub-sample of forty women, test-retest</pubmed_abstract><journal>Public health nutrition</journal><pagination>691-700</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10200570</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Development and validation of the Dental Nutrition Knowledge Competency Scale for low-income women.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10200570</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Freeland-Graves J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Babaei M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sachdev PK</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Development and validation of the Dental Nutrition Knowledge Competency Scale for low-income women.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To develop and validate a Dental Nutrition Knowledge Competency Scale to assess dental health-related nutrition knowledge of low-income women.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>This is a cross-sectional study. A literature search for foods/dietary practices related to dental caries was conducted and the items were incorporated into an initial questionnaire. A panel of ten nutrition experts evaluated it for its content, readability and relevance, and a focus group of six low-income women determined its readability and comprehension. Then the questionnaire was administered to 150 low-income women. Construct validity was evaluated by item difficulty, item discrimination and factor analysis. Internal consistency reliability was tested via Cronbach's α. In a sub-sample of forty women, test-retest</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Mar</publication><modification>2025-05-31T23:14:19.04Z</modification><creation>2025-05-31T23:14:19.04Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10200570</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31588884</pubmed><doi>10.1017/s1368980019002714</doi><doi>10.1017/S1368980019002714</doi></cross_references></HashMap>