<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Sturner R</submitter><funding>NICHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>national institute of mental health</funding><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><pagination>3065-3076</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10214166</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>53(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Prior studies suggest autism-specific and general developmental screens are complementary for identifying both autism and developmental delay (DD). Parents completed autism and developmental screens before 18-month visits. Children with failed screens for autism (n = 167) and age, gender, and practice-matched children passing screens (n = 241) completed diagnostic evaluations for autism and developmental delay. When referral for autism and/or DD was considered, overall false positives from the autism screens were less frequent than for referral for autism alone. Presence of a failed communication subscale in the developmental screen was a red flag for autism and/or DD. An ordinally-scored autism screen had more favorable characteristics when considering autism and/or DD, yet none of the sc</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of autism and developmental disorders</journal><pubmed_title>Do Autism-Specific and General Developmental Screens Have Complementary Clinical Value?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10214166</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R44 HD104973</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R44MH085399.</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R44 MH085399</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Howard B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stewart-Artz L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Attar S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sturner R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bergmann P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bet K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Do Autism-Specific and General Developmental Screens Have Complementary Clinical Value?</name><description>Prior studies suggest autism-specific and general developmental screens are complementary for identifying both autism and developmental delay (DD). Parents completed autism and developmental screens before 18-month visits. Children with failed screens for autism (n = 167) and age, gender, and practice-matched children passing screens (n = 241) completed diagnostic evaluations for autism and developmental delay. When referral for autism and/or DD was considered, overall false positives from the autism screens were less frequent than for referral for autism alone. Presence of a failed communication subscale in the developmental screen was a red flag for autism and/or DD. An ordinally-scored autism screen had more favorable characteristics when considering autism and/or DD, yet none of the sc</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-22T15:05:19.632Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T01:18:23.794Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10214166</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35579791</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s10803-022-05541-y</doi></cross_references></HashMap>