{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["13"],"submitter":["Marsman MS"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Introduction</h4>The use of an 'eversion' technique is not unequivocally proven to be superior to carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty. An up-to-date systematic review is needed for evaluation of benefits and harms of these two techniques.<h4>Methods</h4>RCTs comparing eversion technique versus endarterectomy with patch angioplasty in patients with a symptomatic and significant (≥50 %) stenosis of the internal carotid artery were enrolled. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality rate, health-related quality of life and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included 30-day stroke and mortality rate, (a) symptomatic arterial occlusion or restenosis, and adverse events not critical for decision making.<h4>Results</h4>Four RCTs were included with 1272 surgical procedures fo"],"journal":["Surgery open science"],"pagination":["99-110"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10242571"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Eversion technique versus traditional carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC10242571"],"pubmed_authors":["Marsman MS","Wetterslev J","Vriens PWHE","Jahrome AK","Bleys RLAW","Moll FL","Reijnen MMPJ","Koning GG","Keus F"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Eversion technique versus traditional carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis.","description":"<h4>Introduction</h4>The use of an 'eversion' technique is not unequivocally proven to be superior to carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty. An up-to-date systematic review is needed for evaluation of benefits and harms of these two techniques.<h4>Methods</h4>RCTs comparing eversion technique versus endarterectomy with patch angioplasty in patients with a symptomatic and significant (≥50 %) stenosis of the internal carotid artery were enrolled. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality rate, health-related quality of life and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included 30-day stroke and mortality rate, (a) symptomatic arterial occlusion or restenosis, and adverse events not critical for decision making.<h4>Results</h4>Four RCTs were included with 1272 surgical procedures fo","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023 Jun","modification":"2025-04-19T07:23:06.382Z","creation":"2025-04-19T07:23:06.382Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC10242571","cross_references":{"pubmed":["37288439"],"doi":["10.1016/j.sopen.2023.05.003"]}}