<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Jee YH</submitter><funding>National Cancer Institute</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>796-805</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10244045</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>52(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for breast cancer, developed using European and Asian genome-wide association studies (GWAS), have been shown to have good discrimination in Asian women. However, prospective calibration of absolute risk prediction models, based on a PRS or PRS combined with lifestyle, clinical and environmental factors, in Asian women is limited.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We consider several PRSs trained using European and/or Asian GWAS. For each PRS, we evaluate the discrimination and calibration of three absolute risk models among 41 031 women from the Korean Cancer Prevention Study (KCPS)-II Biobank: (i) a model using incidence, mortality and risk factor distributions (reference inputs) among US women and European relative risks; (ii) a recalibrated model, using Korean reference but European relative risks; and (iii) a fully Korean-based model using Korean reference and relative risk estimates from KCPS.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>All Asian and European PRS improved discrimination over lifestyle, clinical and environmental (Qx) factors in Korean women. US-based absolute risk models overestimated the risks for women aged ≥50 years, and this overestimation was larger for models that only included PRS (expected-to-observed ratio E/O = 1.2 for women &lt;50, E/O = 2.7 for women ≥50). Recalibrated and Korean-based risk models had better calibration in the large, although the risk in the highest decile was consistently overestimated. Absolute risk projections suggest that risk-reducing lifestyle changes would lead to larger absolute risk reductions among women at higher PRS.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Absolute risk models incorporating PRS trained in European and Asian GWAS and population-appropriate average age-specific incidences may be useful for risk-stratified interventions in Korean women.</pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of epidemiology</journal><pubmed_title>Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer in Korean women.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10244045</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U01 CA261339</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 CA249866</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Jee YH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ho WK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Easton DF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jung KJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kraft P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teo SH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer in Korean women.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for breast cancer, developed using European and Asian genome-wide association studies (GWAS), have been shown to have good discrimination in Asian women. However, prospective calibration of absolute risk prediction models, based on a PRS or PRS combined with lifestyle, clinical and environmental factors, in Asian women is limited.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We consider several PRSs trained using European and/or Asian GWAS. For each PRS, we evaluate the discrimination and calibration of three absolute risk models among 41 031 women from the Korean Cancer Prevention Study (KCPS)-II Biobank: (i) a model using incidence, mortality and risk factor distributions (reference inputs) among US women and European relative risks; (ii) a recalibrated model, using Korean reference but European relative risks; and (iii) a fully Korean-based model using Korean reference and relative risk estimates from KCPS.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>All Asian and European PRS improved discrimination over lifestyle, clinical and environmental (Qx) factors in Korean women. US-based absolute risk models overestimated the risks for women aged ≥50 years, and this overestimation was larger for models that only included PRS (expected-to-observed ratio E/O = 1.2 for women &lt;50, E/O = 2.7 for women ≥50). Recalibrated and Korean-based risk models had better calibration in the large, although the risk in the highest decile was consistently overestimated. Absolute risk projections suggest that risk-reducing lifestyle changes would lead to larger absolute risk reductions among women at higher PRS.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Absolute risk models incorporating PRS trained in European and Asian GWAS and population-appropriate average age-specific incidences may be useful for risk-stratified interventions in Korean women.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-21T17:24:31.161Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T16:23:48.406Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10244045</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36343017</pubmed><doi>10.1093/ije/dyac206</doi></cross_references></HashMap>