{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Guydish J"],"funding":["NIDA NIH HHS"],"pagination":["34"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10276468"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["18(1)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Smoking prevalence is high among people in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, and program interventions to address smoking are often complex and lengthy. This cluster-randomized trial tested whether a brief multi-component intervention impacted tobacco outcomes among staff and clients.<h4>Methods</h4>Seven SUD treatment programs were randomly assigned to the multi-component intervention or to waitlist control. The 6-month intervention included a leadership motivation assessment, program incentives, 4 staff training sessions and a leadership learning community session. Survey data were collected from staff and clients at pre- and post-intervention. Outcomes were first compared across condition (intervention vs waitlist control), and then examined pre- to post-interve"],"journal":["Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy"],"pubmed_title":["A cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment."],"pmcid":["PMC10276468"],"funding_grant_id":["T32DA007250"],"pubmed_authors":["Campbell BK","Masson CL","Guydish J","McCuistian C","Le T","Delucchi K","Hosakote S"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"A cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Smoking prevalence is high among people in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, and program interventions to address smoking are often complex and lengthy. This cluster-randomized trial tested whether a brief multi-component intervention impacted tobacco outcomes among staff and clients.<h4>Methods</h4>Seven SUD treatment programs were randomly assigned to the multi-component intervention or to waitlist control. The 6-month intervention included a leadership motivation assessment, program incentives, 4 staff training sessions and a leadership learning community session. Survey data were collected from staff and clients at pre- and post-intervention. Outcomes were first compared across condition (intervention vs waitlist control), and then examined pre- to post-interve","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023 Jun","modification":"2025-04-18T20:35:56.641Z","creation":"2025-02-19T00:49:53.124Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC10276468","cross_references":{"pubmed":["37328775"],"doi":["10.1186/s13011-023-00539-w"]}}