<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>21(1)</volume><submitter>Chen Z</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The development of machine learning models for aiding in the diagnosis of mental disorder is recognized as a significant breakthrough in the field of psychiatry. However, clinical practice of such models remains a challenge, with poor generalizability being a major limitation.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Here, we conducted a pre-registered meta-research assessment on neuroimaging-based models in the psychiatric literature, quantitatively examining global and regional sampling issues over recent decades, from a view that has been relatively underexplored. A total of 476 studies (n = 118,137) were included in the current assessment. Based on these findings, we built a comprehensive 5-star rating system to quantitatively evaluate the quality of existing machine learning models for psych</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC medicine</journal><pagination>241</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10318841</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Sampling inequalities affect generalization of neuroimaging-based diagnostic classifiers in psychiatry.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10318841</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Chuan-Peng H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Feng Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xiao Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eickhoff SB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hu B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miao K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dai X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leonov A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Becker B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tang Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Sampling inequalities affect generalization of neuroimaging-based diagnostic classifiers in psychiatry.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The development of machine learning models for aiding in the diagnosis of mental disorder is recognized as a significant breakthrough in the field of psychiatry. However, clinical practice of such models remains a challenge, with poor generalizability being a major limitation.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Here, we conducted a pre-registered meta-research assessment on neuroimaging-based models in the psychiatric literature, quantitatively examining global and regional sampling issues over recent decades, from a view that has been relatively underexplored. A total of 476 studies (n = 118,137) were included in the current assessment. Based on these findings, we built a comprehensive 5-star rating system to quantitatively evaluate the quality of existing machine learning models for psych</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jul</publication><modification>2025-04-26T18:44:46.11Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T15:53:10.179Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10318841</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37400814</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12916-023-02941-4</doi></cross_references></HashMap>