<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>18(8)</volume><submitter>Gu S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction and aims&lt;/h4>High intensity interval training (HIIT) is considered as an alternative exercise modality to moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) for heart failure (HF) patients. Yet a growing number of trials demonstrated inconsistent findings about the effectiveness of HIIT versus MICT until SMARTEX study and OptimEx-Clin study have made a consistent negative conclusion that HIIT was not superior to MICT. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis involving a subgroup analysis of total exercise time (TET) and disease categories of HF to investigate if TET could affect the superiority of HIIT when compared with MICT.&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>An electronic literature search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTria</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pagination>e0290362</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10434865</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Effects of high intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10434865</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Gu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Du X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guo S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yu Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effects of high intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction and aims&lt;/h4>High intensity interval training (HIIT) is considered as an alternative exercise modality to moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) for heart failure (HF) patients. Yet a growing number of trials demonstrated inconsistent findings about the effectiveness of HIIT versus MICT until SMARTEX study and OptimEx-Clin study have made a consistent negative conclusion that HIIT was not superior to MICT. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis involving a subgroup analysis of total exercise time (TET) and disease categories of HF to investigate if TET could affect the superiority of HIIT when compared with MICT.&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>An electronic literature search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTria</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023</publication><modification>2025-04-05T12:35:33.234Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T12:35:33.234Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10434865</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37590312</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0290362</doi></cross_references></HashMap>