<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>53(8)</volume><submitter>Hong JA</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background and objectives&lt;/h4>Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a bridge to eventual heart transplantation (HT) is increasingly used worldwide. However, the effect of different VA-ECMO types on HT outcomes remains unclear.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This was a retrospective observational study of 111 patients receiving VA-ECMO and awaiting HT. We assessed 3 ECMO configuration groups: peripheral (n=76), central (n=12), and peripheral to central ECMO conversion (n=23). Cox proportional hazards regression and landmark analysis were conducted to analyze the effect of the ECMO configuration on HT and in-hospital mortality rates. We also evaluated adverse events during ECMO support.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>HT was performed in the peripheral (n=48, 63.2%), central (n=10, 83.3%), and c</pubmed_abstract><journal>Korean circulation journal</journal><pagination>535-547</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10435828</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparison of Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Configurations for Patients Listed for Heart Transplantation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10435828</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Jung SH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pack D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hyun J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee SE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kang PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hong JA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Configurations for Patients Listed for Heart Transplantation.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background and objectives&lt;/h4>Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a bridge to eventual heart transplantation (HT) is increasingly used worldwide. However, the effect of different VA-ECMO types on HT outcomes remains unclear.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This was a retrospective observational study of 111 patients receiving VA-ECMO and awaiting HT. We assessed 3 ECMO configuration groups: peripheral (n=76), central (n=12), and peripheral to central ECMO conversion (n=23). Cox proportional hazards regression and landmark analysis were conducted to analyze the effect of the ECMO configuration on HT and in-hospital mortality rates. We also evaluated adverse events during ECMO support.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>HT was performed in the peripheral (n=48, 63.2%), central (n=10, 83.3%), and c</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-05T11:11:31.204Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T11:11:31.204Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10435828</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37271752</pubmed><doi>10.4070/kcj.2022.0348</doi></cross_references></HashMap>