<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Magarakis L</submitter><funding>Umeå University</funding><funding>Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement</funding><funding>Swedish Cancer Society</funding><funding>Center for clinical research county of Värmland</funding><funding>Lena Wäppling foundation</funding><pagination>e071246</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10481827</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Salpingectomy is currently suggested as an alternative to tubal ligation for sterilisation. Precursor lesions of ovarian carcinoma can be found in the fallopian tubes; thus, salpingectomy could possibly reduce the incidence. Most of the existing trials on safety are small, on caesarean section and report on surrogate ovarian function measures. Randomised trials in laparoscopy are lacking. Well-designed trials are needed to evaluate safety of laparoscopic opportunistic salpingectomy.&lt;h4>Methods and analysis&lt;/h4>In SALSTER, a national register-based randomised controlled non-inferiority trial, 968 women &lt;50 years, wishing laparoscopic sterilisation will be randomised to either salpingectomy or tubal ligation. The Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pubmed_title>SALpingectomy for STERilisation (SALSTER): study protocol for a Swedish multicentre register-based randomised controlled trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10481827</pmcid><funding_grant_id>LIVFOU-929703</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ALFGBG-965130 and ALF RegVB-969584</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>N/A for the award/grant number</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>21 1408 Pj</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Idahl A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liv P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sundfeldt K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palsson M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Strandell A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Magarakis L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>SALpingectomy for STERilisation (SALSTER): study protocol for a Swedish multicentre register-based randomised controlled trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Salpingectomy is currently suggested as an alternative to tubal ligation for sterilisation. Precursor lesions of ovarian carcinoma can be found in the fallopian tubes; thus, salpingectomy could possibly reduce the incidence. Most of the existing trials on safety are small, on caesarean section and report on surrogate ovarian function measures. Randomised trials in laparoscopy are lacking. Well-designed trials are needed to evaluate safety of laparoscopic opportunistic salpingectomy.&lt;h4>Methods and analysis&lt;/h4>In SALSTER, a national register-based randomised controlled non-inferiority trial, 968 women &lt;50 years, wishing laparoscopic sterilisation will be randomised to either salpingectomy or tubal ligation. The Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Sep</publication><modification>2026-05-29T03:52:22.897Z</modification><creation>2024-11-06T07:00:12.304Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10481827</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37666548</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071246</doi></cross_references></HashMap>