<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Pambet M</submitter><funding>Biosynex Society</funding><pagination>5707</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10488604</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(17)</volume><pubmed_abstract>We conducted a prospective double-blind study to compare two vaginal diagnostic methods in singleton pregnancies with threatened preterm labor (TPL) at the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (France) from August 2018 to December 2020. Our main objective was to compare the diagnostic capacity at admission, in terms of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), of Premaquick&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> (combined detection of IL-6/total IGFBP-1/native IGFBP-1) and QuikCheck fFN™ (fetal fibronectin) for delivery within 7 days in cases of TPL. We included 193 patients. Premaquick&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> had a sensitivity close to 89%, equivalent to QuikCheck fFN™, but a higher statistical specificity of 49.5% against 38.6% for QuikCheck fFN™. We found no superiority of Premaquick&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup></pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Benefits of Premaquick&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> Combined Detection of IL-6/Total IGFBP-1/Native IGFBP-1 to Predict Preterm Delivery.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10488604</pmcid><funding_grant_id>NA</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Gallot D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Delabaere A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pereira B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Comptour A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sapin V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pambet M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sirodot F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cahierc R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rouzaire M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Benefits of Premaquick&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> Combined Detection of IL-6/Total IGFBP-1/Native IGFBP-1 to Predict Preterm Delivery.</name><description>We conducted a prospective double-blind study to compare two vaginal diagnostic methods in singleton pregnancies with threatened preterm labor (TPL) at the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (France) from August 2018 to December 2020. Our main objective was to compare the diagnostic capacity at admission, in terms of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), of Premaquick&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> (combined detection of IL-6/total IGFBP-1/native IGFBP-1) and QuikCheck fFN™ (fetal fibronectin) for delivery within 7 days in cases of TPL. We included 193 patients. Premaquick&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> had a sensitivity close to 89%, equivalent to QuikCheck fFN™, but a higher statistical specificity of 49.5% against 38.6% for QuikCheck fFN™. We found no superiority of Premaquick&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup></description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Sep</publication><modification>2025-05-18T10:33:21.42Z</modification><creation>2024-10-17T15:49:07.614Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10488604</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37685773</pubmed><doi>10.3390/jcm12175707</doi></cross_references></HashMap>