<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>4(1)</volume><submitter>Dixon J</submitter><funding>Canadian Institutes of Health Research</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) and other forms of research co-production are increasingly recognized as valuable approaches to knowledge creation as a way to better facilitate the implementation of scientific findings. However, the nature of some scientific work can preclude direct knowledge to action as a likely outcome. Do IKT approaches have value in such cases?&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This study used a qualitative case study approach to better understand the function of IKT in a non-traditional application: basic and clinical science investigating the causes and consequences of food allergy. Building off previous baseline findings, data were obtained through in-depth interviews with project scientists and steering committee members and complemented by researcher obser</pubmed_abstract><journal>Implementation science communications</journal><pagination>120</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10523745</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Reconceptualizing Integrated Knowledge Translation goals: a case study on basic and clinical science investigating the causes and consequences of food allergy.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10523745</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Elliott SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shantz E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dixon J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clarke AE</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Reconceptualizing Integrated Knowledge Translation goals: a case study on basic and clinical science investigating the causes and consequences of food allergy.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) and other forms of research co-production are increasingly recognized as valuable approaches to knowledge creation as a way to better facilitate the implementation of scientific findings. However, the nature of some scientific work can preclude direct knowledge to action as a likely outcome. Do IKT approaches have value in such cases?&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This study used a qualitative case study approach to better understand the function of IKT in a non-traditional application: basic and clinical science investigating the causes and consequences of food allergy. Building off previous baseline findings, data were obtained through in-depth interviews with project scientists and steering committee members and complemented by researcher obser</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-19T06:48:54.599Z</modification><creation>2024-12-04T05:01:13.626Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10523745</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37759275</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s43058-023-00473-9</doi></cross_references></HashMap>