<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Wood ME</submitter><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NINDS NIH HHS</funding><funding>Canadian Institutes of Health Research</funding><pagination>4651-4661</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10544702</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>19(10)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>We examined whether sex modifies the association between APOE ε2 and cognitive decline in two independent samples.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We used observational data from cognitively unimpaired non-Hispanic White (NHW) and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) adults. Linear mixed models examined interactive associations of APOE genotype (ε2 or ε4 carrier vs. ε3/ε3) and sex on cognitive decline in NHW and NHB participants separately.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In both Sample 1 (N = 9766) and Sample 2 (N = 915), sex modified the association between APOE ε2 and cognitive decline in NHW participants. Specifically, relative to APOE ε3/ε3, APOE ε2 protected against cognitive decline in men but not women. Among APOE ε2 carriers, men had slower decline than women. Among APOE ε3/ε3 carriers, cognitive trajecto</pubmed_abstract><journal>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association</journal><pubmed_title>Sex differences in associations between APOE ε2 and longitudinal cognitive decline.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10544702</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 AG053760</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005146</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005142</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG072475</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG047266</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P20 AG068053</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UF1 NS125513</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 AG000247</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG019610</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG022018</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K99 AG061238</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R00 AG061238</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG072958</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG072959</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG008702</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG010124</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG012300</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG047270</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG066546</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG010161</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG066509</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG049638</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 AG072122</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P20 AG068024</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG072947</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG015819</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG028383</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG013846</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K99 AG065501</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG008017</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG010133</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG033514</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005681</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG052488</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RF1 AG070436</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG047366</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG072975</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P20 AG068077</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG071638</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG023501</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG008051</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG010129</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG013854</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>173253</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005138</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG059727</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005134</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005136</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG025688</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG035982</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005131</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RF1 AG054617</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 NS017950</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005133</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG016574</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P20 AG068082</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG016573</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG017917</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>438475</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Casaletto KB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rabin JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barnes LL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>George KM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Swardfager W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Joie R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brickman AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>ADNI and Prevent-AD Research Groups</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong YY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xiong LY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Black SE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Binet AP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Masellis M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Satizabal CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dams-O'Connor K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schneider JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Villeneuve S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buckley RF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palta P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wood ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lim ASP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kumar RG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nichols E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pa J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Sex differences in associations between APOE ε2 and longitudinal cognitive decline.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>We examined whether sex modifies the association between APOE ε2 and cognitive decline in two independent samples.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We used observational data from cognitively unimpaired non-Hispanic White (NHW) and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) adults. Linear mixed models examined interactive associations of APOE genotype (ε2 or ε4 carrier vs. ε3/ε3) and sex on cognitive decline in NHW and NHB participants separately.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In both Sample 1 (N = 9766) and Sample 2 (N = 915), sex modified the association between APOE ε2 and cognitive decline in NHW participants. Specifically, relative to APOE ε3/ε3, APOE ε2 protected against cognitive decline in men but not women. Among APOE ε2 carriers, men had slower decline than women. Among APOE ε3/ε3 carriers, cognitive trajecto</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-04T11:36:37.371Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T11:36:37.371Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10544702</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36994910</pubmed><doi>10.1002/alz.13036</doi></cross_references></HashMap>