<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Sanchez-Tillo E</submitter><funding>Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca</funding><funding>Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation</funding><funding>Olga Torres Foundation</funding><funding>Spanish Association Against Cancer</funding><funding>Spanish National Institute of Health Carlos III</funding><pagination>e164629</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10619495</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>8(20)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Despite being in the same pathway, mutations of KRAS and BRAF in colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) determine distinct progression courses. ZEB1 induces an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and is associated with worse progression in most carcinomas. Using samples from patients with CRC, mouse models of KrasG12D and BrafV600E CRC, and a Zeb1-deficient mouse, we show that ZEB1 had opposite functions in KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRCs. In KrasG12D CRCs, ZEB1 was correlated with a worse prognosis and a higher number of larger and undifferentiated (mesenchymal or EMT-like) tumors. Surprisingly, in BrafV600E CRC, ZEB1 was associated with better prognosis; fewer, smaller, and more differentiated (reduced EMT) primary tumors; and fewer metastases. ZEB1 was positively correlated in KRAS-mutant CRC c</pubmed_abstract><journal>JCI insight</journal><pubmed_title>The EMT factor ZEB1 paradoxically inhibits EMT in BRAF-mutant carcinomas.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10619495</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2017-SGR-1174</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2021-SGR-01328</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>AECC,PROYE19040POST_001</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PID2020-116338RB-I00</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CP13/00200,PI18/00244</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>SAF2017-84918-R</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>Biannual Grant A-2019/2020</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Siles L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pedrosa L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Darling DS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lozano JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sanchez-Moral L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vila I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Esteve-Codina A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Postigo A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Castells A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sanchez-Tillo E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maurel J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gyorffy B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cuatrecasas M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The EMT factor ZEB1 paradoxically inhibits EMT in BRAF-mutant carcinomas.</name><description>Despite being in the same pathway, mutations of KRAS and BRAF in colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) determine distinct progression courses. ZEB1 induces an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and is associated with worse progression in most carcinomas. Using samples from patients with CRC, mouse models of KrasG12D and BrafV600E CRC, and a Zeb1-deficient mouse, we show that ZEB1 had opposite functions in KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRCs. In KrasG12D CRCs, ZEB1 was correlated with a worse prognosis and a higher number of larger and undifferentiated (mesenchymal or EMT-like) tumors. Surprisingly, in BrafV600E CRC, ZEB1 was associated with better prognosis; fewer, smaller, and more differentiated (reduced EMT) primary tumors; and fewer metastases. ZEB1 was positively correlated in KRAS-mutant CRC c</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Oct</publication><modification>2026-05-29T12:18:55.737Z</modification><creation>2025-04-20T01:34:12.337Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10619495</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37870961</pubmed><doi>10.1172/jci.insight.164629</doi></cross_references></HashMap>