<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>42(1)</volume><submitter>Wimmer K</submitter><funding>Austrian Breast &amp;amp; Colorectal Study Group</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel (D) are commonly used in a sequential regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of early, high-risk or locally advanced breast cancer (BC). Novel approaches to increase the response rate combine this treatment with immunotherapies such as PD-1 inhibition. However, the expected stimulatory effect on lymphocytes may depend on the chemotherapy backbone. Therefore, we separately compared the immunomodulatory effects of EC and D in the setting of a randomized clinical trial.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Tumor and blood samples of 154 patients from the ABCSG-34 trial were available (76 patients received four cycles of EC followed by four cycles of D; 78 patients get the reverse treatment sequence). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, circulating lymphoc</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of experimental &amp; clinical cancer research : CR</journal><pagination>300</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10644559</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10644559</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Birnleitner H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Egle D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frantal S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Exner R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fitzal F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wimmer K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bago-Horvath Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Balic M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oehler R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rudas M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Filipits M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brostjan C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gnant M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singer CF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sachet M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bartsch R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ramos C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Differential immunomodulatory effects of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel in breast cancer patients.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel (D) are commonly used in a sequential regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of early, high-risk or locally advanced breast cancer (BC). Novel approaches to increase the response rate combine this treatment with immunotherapies such as PD-1 inhibition. However, the expected stimulatory effect on lymphocytes may depend on the chemotherapy backbone. Therefore, we separately compared the immunomodulatory effects of EC and D in the setting of a randomized clinical trial.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Tumor and blood samples of 154 patients from the ABCSG-34 trial were available (76 patients received four cycles of EC followed by four cycles of D; 78 patients get the reverse treatment sequence). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, circulating lymphoc</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-05T08:50:50.216Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T04:23:14.476Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10644559</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37957750</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13046-023-02876-x</doi></cross_references></HashMap>