<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>20(1)</volume><submitter>Dokollari A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Patients who are not candidates for traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and amenable only for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stents can receive the "gold standard" left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to left anterior descending artery (LAD) anastomosis through robotic-assisted CABG and PCI to non-LAD coronary targets.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>We aimed to analyse clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted CABG.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A total of 2,280 consecutive patients who had undergone robotic-assisted CABG between May 2005 and June 2021 were included in our study. Robotic-assisted LITA harvest was followed by LITA-LAD manual anastomosis through a 4 cm left thoracotomy. Hybrid coronary intervention (HCR) consists of stent implantation in a non-LAD coronary artery </pubmed_abstract><journal>EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology</journal><pagination>45-55</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10756223</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Long-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical coronary artery revascularisation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10756223</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Khan AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montone G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shapiro TA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gnall E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dokollari A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Torregrossa G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coady P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wertan MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gray WA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Erten O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sicouri S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McGeehin F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ramlawi B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sutter FP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caroline M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kjelstrom S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Badri M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Long-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical coronary artery revascularisation.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Patients who are not candidates for traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and amenable only for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stents can receive the "gold standard" left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to left anterior descending artery (LAD) anastomosis through robotic-assisted CABG and PCI to non-LAD coronary targets.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>We aimed to analyse clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted CABG.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A total of 2,280 consecutive patients who had undergone robotic-assisted CABG between May 2005 and June 2021 were included in our study. Robotic-assisted LITA harvest was followed by LITA-LAD manual anastomosis through a 4 cm left thoracotomy. Hybrid coronary intervention (HCR) consists of stent implantation in a non-LAD coronary artery </description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-04T02:26:53.698Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T02:26:53.698Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10756223</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37994042</pubmed><doi>10.4244/eij-d-23-00373</doi><doi>10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00373</doi></cross_references></HashMap>