<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>309(2)</volume><submitter>Ziv E</submitter><funding>ConTIPI Medical Ltd.</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To investigate whether ProVate, a novel, disposable, self-inserted vaginal device for pelvic organ prolapse management, clinically affects the vaginal microflora, as compared with a commercially available ring pessary, to assess its microbiological safety.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This interventional, prospective, multi-center, open-label, randomized, controlled, statistically powered (noninferiority), home-use, crossover study was conducted at seven sites. Participants were randomized into either group A (using ProVate and then a new reusable commercially available ring pessary [control]) or B (using control device and then ProVate) with a 1:1 ratio. Noninferiority of ProVate over the control was evaluated for the primary endpoint, which was based on meeting one of the failure crite</pubmed_abstract><journal>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</journal><pagination>571-579</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10808192</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Vaginal microflora following the use of a disposable home-use vaginal device and a commercially available ring pessary for pelvic organ prolapse management: a randomized controlled trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10808192</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ziv E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Erlich T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Keller N</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Vaginal microflora following the use of a disposable home-use vaginal device and a commercially available ring pessary for pelvic organ prolapse management: a randomized controlled trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To investigate whether ProVate, a novel, disposable, self-inserted vaginal device for pelvic organ prolapse management, clinically affects the vaginal microflora, as compared with a commercially available ring pessary, to assess its microbiological safety.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This interventional, prospective, multi-center, open-label, randomized, controlled, statistically powered (noninferiority), home-use, crossover study was conducted at seven sites. Participants were randomized into either group A (using ProVate and then a new reusable commercially available ring pessary [control]) or B (using control device and then ProVate) with a 1:1 ratio. Noninferiority of ProVate over the control was evaluated for the primary endpoint, which was based on meeting one of the failure crite</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Feb</publication><modification>2026-07-15T10:43:15.212Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T21:34:28.241Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10808192</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37882871</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00404-023-07260-w</doi></cross_references></HashMap>