<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Marzucco A</submitter><funding>the European Union-NextGenerationEU through the Italian Ministry of University and Research under PNRR-Mission 4 Component 2, Investment 3.3 "Partnerships extended to universities, re-search centres</funding><funding>Monica Cricca</funding><pagination>153</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10820201</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;i>Candida&lt;/i> spp. are an important opportunistic pathogen that can represent a possible cause of severe infections, especially in immunocompromised individuals. The clinical impact of &lt;i>Candida&lt;/i> spp. depends, in part, on the ability to form biofilms, communities of nestled cells into the extracellular matrix. In this study, we compared the biofilm formation ability of 83 strains of &lt;i>Candida&lt;/i> spp. isolated from blood cultures and other materials, such as respiratory samples, urine, and exudate, and their sensitivity to fluconazole (FLZ). Strains were divided into tertiles to establish cut-offs to classify isolates as low, moderate, or high biofilm producers (&lt;0.26, 0.266-0.839, >0.839) and biofilms with low, moderate, or high metabolic activity (&lt;0.053, 0.053-0.183, >0.183). A no</pubmed_abstract><journal>Microorganisms</journal><pubmed_title>Evaluation of Biofilm Production and Antifungal Susceptibility to Fluconazole in Clinical Isolates of &lt;i>Candida&lt;/i> spp. in Both Planktonic and Biofilm Form.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10820201</pmcid><funding_grant_id>Ricerca Fondamentale Orientata (RFO) 2021 and 2022</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>352/2021 - CUP J33C22001330009</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Tamburini MV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Congestri F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brandolini M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taddei F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Colosimo C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montanari MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dirani G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sambri V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zannoli S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schiavone P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gatti G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fantini M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morotti M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Manera M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cricca M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arfilli V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grumiro L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Pascali AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marzucco A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Denicolo A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Evaluation of Biofilm Production and Antifungal Susceptibility to Fluconazole in Clinical Isolates of &lt;i>Candida&lt;/i> spp. in Both Planktonic and Biofilm Form.</name><description>&lt;i>Candida&lt;/i> spp. are an important opportunistic pathogen that can represent a possible cause of severe infections, especially in immunocompromised individuals. The clinical impact of &lt;i>Candida&lt;/i> spp. depends, in part, on the ability to form biofilms, communities of nestled cells into the extracellular matrix. In this study, we compared the biofilm formation ability of 83 strains of &lt;i>Candida&lt;/i> spp. isolated from blood cultures and other materials, such as respiratory samples, urine, and exudate, and their sensitivity to fluconazole (FLZ). Strains were divided into tertiles to establish cut-offs to classify isolates as low, moderate, or high biofilm producers (&lt;0.26, 0.266-0.839, >0.839) and biofilms with low, moderate, or high metabolic activity (&lt;0.053, 0.053-0.183, >0.183). A no</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-04T09:16:59.013Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T09:16:59.013Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10820201</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38257980</pubmed><doi>10.3390/microorganisms12010153</doi></cross_references></HashMap>