<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Roy E</submitter><funding>NICHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIBIB NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><pagination>101341</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10825614</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>65</volume><pubmed_abstract>Cross-sectional studies have linked differences in white matter tissue properties to reading skills. However, past studies have reported a range of, sometimes conflicting, results. Some studies suggest that white matter properties act as individual-level traits predictive of reading skill, whereas others suggest that reading skill and white matter develop as a function of an individual's educational experience. In the present study, we tested two hypotheses: a) that diffusion properties of the white matter reflect stable brain characteristics that relate to stable individual differences in reading ability or b) that white matter is a dynamic system, linked with learning over time. To answer these questions, we examined the relationship between white matter and reading in a five-year longitudinal dataset and a series of large-scale, single-observation, cross-sectional datasets (N = 14,249 total participants). We find that gains in reading skill correspond to longitudinal changes in the white matter. However, in the cross-sectional datasets, we find no evidence for the hypothesis that individual differences in white matter predict reading skill. These findings highlight the link between dynamic processes in the white matter and learning.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Developmental cognitive neuroscience</journal><pubmed_title>White matter and literacy: A dynamic system in flux.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10825614</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P50 HD052120</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041117</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 DA041123</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 DA041147</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041174</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 EB027585</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RF1 MH121868</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HD095861</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041134</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041156</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041093</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA051037</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041106</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041028</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041089</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041022</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041120</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041148</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041048</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA041025</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA051039</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA051016</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA051038</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA051018</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54 MH091657</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA050988</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA050987</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DA050989</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Sugrue LP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McCandliss BD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kruper J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yeatman JD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rokem A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rauschecker AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bloom D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Richie-Halford A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roy E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown TT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nedelec P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jernigan TL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Narayan M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>White matter and literacy: A dynamic system in flux.</name><description>Cross-sectional studies have linked differences in white matter tissue properties to reading skills. However, past studies have reported a range of, sometimes conflicting, results. Some studies suggest that white matter properties act as individual-level traits predictive of reading skill, whereas others suggest that reading skill and white matter develop as a function of an individual's educational experience. In the present study, we tested two hypotheses: a) that diffusion properties of the white matter reflect stable brain characteristics that relate to stable individual differences in reading ability or b) that white matter is a dynamic system, linked with learning over time. To answer these questions, we examined the relationship between white matter and reading in a five-year longitudinal dataset and a series of large-scale, single-observation, cross-sectional datasets (N = 14,249 total participants). We find that gains in reading skill correspond to longitudinal changes in the white matter. However, in the cross-sectional datasets, we find no evidence for the hypothesis that individual differences in white matter predict reading skill. These findings highlight the link between dynamic processes in the white matter and learning.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Feb</publication><modification>2026-05-29T10:01:46.756Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T04:23:29.514Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10825614</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38219709</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101341</doi></cross_references></HashMap>