<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ikemoto S</submitter><funding>Uehara Memorial Foundation</funding><funding>Canadian Institutes of Health Research</funding><funding>CIHR</funding><pagination>84-95</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10839335</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We aimed to evaluate the contribution of simultaneous recording of electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) in the diagnosis of epilepsy syndrome, localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), and decision-making regarding surgical treatment.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a retrospective study to evaluate patients with focal epilepsy who underwent EEG-fMRI. Two evaluators assessed epilepsy syndrome, presumed focus, and surgical candidacy and defined confidence levels. They assessed these clinical characteristics first without EEG-fMRI and then including EEG-fMRI to assess how the results of EEG-fMRI changed the evaluations. We also determined how the clinical evaluation was affected by the concordance level between the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response and the presumed focus location, and by the confidence level of the BOLD response itself based on the t-value of the primary and secondary clusters.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Fifty-one scans from 48 patients were included. The BOLD map affected 66.7% of the evaluations by altering evaluation items (epilepsy syndrome, presumed focus, or surgical candidacy) or their confidence levels. EEG-fMRI results increased the confidence levels of epilepsy syndrome, presumed focus, or surgical candidacy in 47.1% of patients but reduced clinical confidence in these features in 11.8%. More specifically, the confidence levels increased for epilepsy syndrome in 28.5%, identification of presumed focus in 33.9%, and determination of surgical candidacy in 29.4%. The BOLD signal confidence level, whether high or low, did not influence these clinical factors.&lt;h4>Significance&lt;/h4>Previous studies have emphasized the utility of EEG-fMRI for the localization of the epileptogenic zone. This study demonstrated the potential of EEG-fMRI to influence clinical confidence when determining epilepsy syndrome, the presumed epileptic focus, and surgical candidacy.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Epilepsia open</journal><pubmed_title>Electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging for clinical evaluation in focal epilepsy.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10839335</pmcid><funding_grant_id>FDN 143208</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Pana R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ikemoto S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>von Ellenrieder N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gotman J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging for clinical evaluation in focal epilepsy.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We aimed to evaluate the contribution of simultaneous recording of electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) in the diagnosis of epilepsy syndrome, localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), and decision-making regarding surgical treatment.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a retrospective study to evaluate patients with focal epilepsy who underwent EEG-fMRI. Two evaluators assessed epilepsy syndrome, presumed focus, and surgical candidacy and defined confidence levels. They assessed these clinical characteristics first without EEG-fMRI and then including EEG-fMRI to assess how the results of EEG-fMRI changed the evaluations. We also determined how the clinical evaluation was affected by the concordance level between the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response and the presumed focus location, and by the confidence level of the BOLD response itself based on the t-value of the primary and secondary clusters.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Fifty-one scans from 48 patients were included. The BOLD map affected 66.7% of the evaluations by altering evaluation items (epilepsy syndrome, presumed focus, or surgical candidacy) or their confidence levels. EEG-fMRI results increased the confidence levels of epilepsy syndrome, presumed focus, or surgical candidacy in 47.1% of patients but reduced clinical confidence in these features in 11.8%. More specifically, the confidence levels increased for epilepsy syndrome in 28.5%, identification of presumed focus in 33.9%, and determination of surgical candidacy in 29.4%. The BOLD signal confidence level, whether high or low, did not influence these clinical factors.&lt;h4>Significance&lt;/h4>Previous studies have emphasized the utility of EEG-fMRI for the localization of the epileptogenic zone. This study demonstrated the potential of EEG-fMRI to influence clinical confidence when determining epilepsy syndrome, the presumed epileptic focus, and surgical candidacy.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Feb</publication><modification>2024-11-20T13:20:39.718Z</modification><creation>2024-11-20T13:20:39.718Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10839335</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37724422</pubmed><doi>10.1002/epi4.12829</doi></cross_references></HashMap>