<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Chen CW</submitter><funding>NIDCR NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse</funding><funding>NIH</funding><funding>Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas</funding><funding>Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation</funding><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><funding>Fondation Leducq</funding><funding>U.S. Department of Defense</funding><funding>NHGRI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>Edward P. Evans Foundation</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>1503-1519.e8</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10841682</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>30(11)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Somatic mutations accumulate in all cells with age and can confer a selective advantage, leading to clonal expansion over time. In hematopoietic cells, mutations in a subset of genes regulating DNA repair or epigenetics frequently lead to clonal hematopoiesis (CH). Here, we describe the context and mechanisms that lead to enrichment of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) with mutations in SRCAP, which encodes a chromatin remodeler that also influences DNA repair. We show that SRCAP mutations confer a selective advantage in human cells and in mice upon treatment with the anthracycline-class chemotherapeutic doxorubicin and bone marrow transplantation. Furthermore, Srcap mutations lead to a lymphoid-biased expansion, driven by loss of SRCAP-regulated H2A.Z deposition and increased DNA repair. Al</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cell stem cell</journal><pubmed_title>SRCAP mutations drive clonal hematopoiesis through epigenetic and DNA repair dysregulation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10841682</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 HL148050</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA212733</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R44 CA212733</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA125123</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K08CA263183</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA237291</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>AG036695</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01HL148565</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA210827</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1P01CA265748</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RP180672</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DK058192</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R44 GM136172</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DE029633</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KAW2017.0436</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HG011875</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>GM136172</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R44 HG011875</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K08CA252174</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R56 DK092883</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01 AG036695</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA125123</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K08 CA252174</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01HL148050</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>TNE - 18CVD04</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DK092883</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL148565</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DK092883</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K08 CA263183</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R43 CA212733</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R44 DE029633</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 CA237291</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 CA183252</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01 CA265748</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Gu T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee YT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Waldvogel S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Venters BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Esteve PO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dutta R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sperling AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miller PG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gibson CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pradhan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Keogh MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tovy A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goodell MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen YH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Niroula A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bick AG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reyes JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen CW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Takahashi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Natarajan P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>SRCAP mutations drive clonal hematopoiesis through epigenetic and DNA repair dysregulation.</name><description>Somatic mutations accumulate in all cells with age and can confer a selective advantage, leading to clonal expansion over time. In hematopoietic cells, mutations in a subset of genes regulating DNA repair or epigenetics frequently lead to clonal hematopoiesis (CH). Here, we describe the context and mechanisms that lead to enrichment of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) with mutations in SRCAP, which encodes a chromatin remodeler that also influences DNA repair. We show that SRCAP mutations confer a selective advantage in human cells and in mice upon treatment with the anthracycline-class chemotherapeutic doxorubicin and bone marrow transplantation. Furthermore, Srcap mutations lead to a lymphoid-biased expansion, driven by loss of SRCAP-regulated H2A.Z deposition and increased DNA repair. Al</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Nov</publication><modification>2026-06-02T04:08:52.838Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T00:58:58.728Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10841682</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37863054</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.stem.2023.09.011</doi></cross_references></HashMap>