<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Makinen P</submitter><funding>Tekes</funding><funding>Elsemay Björn Rahasto</funding><funding>Silmäsäätiö</funding><pagination>11</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10874072</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>21(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are widely used surgical methods to correct myopia with comparable efficacy, predictability, and safety. We examined and compared the early changes of tear protein profiles after SMILE and FS-LASIK surgery in order to find possible differences in the initial corneal healing process.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>SMILE operations for 26 eyes were made with Visumax femtosecond laser. In FS-LASIK surgery for 30 eyes, the flaps were made with Ziemer FEMTO LDV Z6 femtosecond laser and stromal ablation with Wavelight EX500 excimer laser. Tear samples were collected preoperatively, and 1.5 h and 1 month postoperatively using glass microcapillary tubes. Tear protein identification and quan</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical proteomics</journal><pubmed_title>Comparison of early changes in tear film protein profiles after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond LASIK (FS-LASIK) surgery.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10874072</pmcid><funding_grant_id>40087/12</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Uusitalo H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Makinen P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nattinen J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aapola U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pietila J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of early changes in tear film protein profiles after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond LASIK (FS-LASIK) surgery.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are widely used surgical methods to correct myopia with comparable efficacy, predictability, and safety. We examined and compared the early changes of tear protein profiles after SMILE and FS-LASIK surgery in order to find possible differences in the initial corneal healing process.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>SMILE operations for 26 eyes were made with Visumax femtosecond laser. In FS-LASIK surgery for 30 eyes, the flaps were made with Ziemer FEMTO LDV Z6 femtosecond laser and stromal ablation with Wavelight EX500 excimer laser. Tear samples were collected preoperatively, and 1.5 h and 1 month postoperatively using glass microcapillary tubes. Tear protein identification and quan</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Feb</publication><modification>2026-06-28T03:13:39.01Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T23:13:36.87Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10874072</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38368345</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12014-024-09460-1</doi></cross_references></HashMap>