<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Xiang P</submitter><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><pagination>66</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10885481</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>22(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Context&lt;/h4>In men with prostate cancer, urinary incontinence is one of the most common long-term side effects of radical prostatectomy (RP). The recovery of urinary continence in patients is positively influenced by preserving the integrity of the neurovascular bundles (NVBs). However, it is still unclear if bilateral nerve sparing (BNS) is superior to unilateral nerve sparing (UNS) in terms of post-RP urinary continence. The aim of this study is to systematically compare the differences in post-RP urinary continence outcomes between BNS and UNS.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The electronic databases of PubMed and Web of Science were comprehensively searched. The search period was up to May 31, 2023. English language articles comparing urinary continence outcomes of patients undergoing BNS and UNS r</pubmed_abstract><journal>World journal of surgical oncology</journal><pubmed_title>Is there any difference in urinary continence between bilateral and unilateral nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10885481</pmcid><funding_grant_id>82072833</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Wang M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xiang P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ping H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guan D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guo D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Du Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yan W</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Is there any difference in urinary continence between bilateral and unilateral nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Context&lt;/h4>In men with prostate cancer, urinary incontinence is one of the most common long-term side effects of radical prostatectomy (RP). The recovery of urinary continence in patients is positively influenced by preserving the integrity of the neurovascular bundles (NVBs). However, it is still unclear if bilateral nerve sparing (BNS) is superior to unilateral nerve sparing (UNS) in terms of post-RP urinary continence. The aim of this study is to systematically compare the differences in post-RP urinary continence outcomes between BNS and UNS.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The electronic databases of PubMed and Web of Science were comprehensively searched. The search period was up to May 31, 2023. English language articles comparing urinary continence outcomes of patients undergoing BNS and UNS r</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Feb</publication><modification>2026-07-15T02:59:44.456Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T03:33:24.976Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10885481</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38395861</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12957-024-03340-6</doi></cross_references></HashMap>