<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Arroyo-Fernandez R</submitter><funding>Regional Department of Education, Culture and Sports (JCCM) and cofinance by Fondos FEDER</funding><funding>Regional Government of Castile-La Mancha</funding><pagination>1105</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10888564</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This review aims to analyse the effectiveness of body weight-supported gait training for improving gait and balance in patients with motor-incomplete spinal cord injuries.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Relevant articles were systematically searched in electronic databases to identify randomised controlled trials of body weight-supported gait training (either with methods of robotic, manual, and functional electrical stimulation assistance) versus conventional physical therapy or no intervention. Subjects were >16 years-old with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury (AIS C or D). Primary outcomes were gait-related parameters (functionality, endurance, and speed) and balance. Quality of life was included as a secondary outcome. Articles were selected up to 31 December 2023.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 673). Nine studies used robotic assistance, four trials performed manual assistance, one study functional electrical stimulation assistance, and one trial performed the intervention without guidance. Robot-assisted body weight-supported gait training improved walking functionality (SMD = 1.74, CI 95%: 1.09 to 2.39), walking endurance (MD = 26.59 m, CI 95% = 22.87 to 30.31), and balance (SMD = 0.63, CI 95% = 0.24 to 1.02).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Body weight-supported gait training is not superior to conventional physiotherapy in gait and balance training in patients with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. However, body weight-supported gait training with robotic assistance does improve walking functionality, walking endurance, and balance, but not walking speed.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Effectiveness of Body Weight-Supported Gait Training on Gait and Balance for Motor-Incomplete Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10888564</pmcid><funding_grant_id>SBPLY/19/180501/000250</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Romay-Barrero H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fernandez-Maestra A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pozuelo-Carrascosa DP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Menchero-Sanchez R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martinez-Galan I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arroyo-Fernandez R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effectiveness of Body Weight-Supported Gait Training on Gait and Balance for Motor-Incomplete Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This review aims to analyse the effectiveness of body weight-supported gait training for improving gait and balance in patients with motor-incomplete spinal cord injuries.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Relevant articles were systematically searched in electronic databases to identify randomised controlled trials of body weight-supported gait training (either with methods of robotic, manual, and functional electrical stimulation assistance) versus conventional physical therapy or no intervention. Subjects were >16 years-old with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury (AIS C or D). Primary outcomes were gait-related parameters (functionality, endurance, and speed) and balance. Quality of life was included as a secondary outcome. Articles were selected up to 31 December 2023.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 673). Nine studies used robotic assistance, four trials performed manual assistance, one study functional electrical stimulation assistance, and one trial performed the intervention without guidance. Robot-assisted body weight-supported gait training improved walking functionality (SMD = 1.74, CI 95%: 1.09 to 2.39), walking endurance (MD = 26.59 m, CI 95% = 22.87 to 30.31), and balance (SMD = 0.63, CI 95% = 0.24 to 1.02).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Body weight-supported gait training is not superior to conventional physiotherapy in gait and balance training in patients with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. However, body weight-supported gait training with robotic assistance does improve walking functionality, walking endurance, and balance, but not walking speed.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Feb</publication><modification>2026-06-29T03:13:47.399Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T03:37:40.916Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10888564</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38398415</pubmed><doi>10.3390/jcm13041105</doi></cross_references></HashMap>