{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["16(1 Suppl)"],"submitter":["Intelangelo L"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and agreement between two devices - Wii Fit Balance Board (WBB) versus Hand-Held Dynamometer (HHD) to measure isometric strength during the athletic shoulder (ASH) test in healthy amateur rugby players.<h4>Methods</h4>Fifteen males (23.73 ± 2.8 years) completed two testing sessions. Maximal isometric contractions using the dominant arm (D) and non-dominant arm (ND) against a WBB and HHD were assessed at three angles of abduction (180°, 'I'; 135°, 'Y' and 90°, 'T'), in a prone lying position.<h4>Results</h4>The results indicate a very large correlation between the HHD and the WBB. WBB provides acceptable reliability at I-Test D (CV = 9.97%, ICC = 0.88) and HHD in the I-Test D (CV = 8.90%, ICC = 0.94), I-Test ND (CV = 8.60%, ICC = 0.95) in peak strength values. The HHD is most reliable in D ASH I-Y-T (CV = 10.94%) and WBB (CV = 11.05%). In the ND ASH I-Y-T test, the HHD is the most reliable (CV = 12.5%) compared to the WBB (CV = 14.43%).<h4>Conclusions</h4>These results suggest that WBB is a reliable device to assess strength in the ASH test with a very large correlation with the HHD. WBB and HHD are two affordable devices to assess isometric shoulder strength."],"journal":["Shoulder & elbow"],"pagination":["110-118"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10901178"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Reliability of two devices for shoulder strength assessment: Wii Fit Balance Board and hand-held dynamometer."],"pmcid":["PMC10901178"],"pubmed_authors":["Bustos C","Elias G","Jerez-Mayorga D","Lassaga I","Intelangelo L"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Reliability of two devices for shoulder strength assessment: Wii Fit Balance Board and hand-held dynamometer.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and agreement between two devices - Wii Fit Balance Board (WBB) versus Hand-Held Dynamometer (HHD) to measure isometric strength during the athletic shoulder (ASH) test in healthy amateur rugby players.<h4>Methods</h4>Fifteen males (23.73 ± 2.8 years) completed two testing sessions. Maximal isometric contractions using the dominant arm (D) and non-dominant arm (ND) against a WBB and HHD were assessed at three angles of abduction (180°, 'I'; 135°, 'Y' and 90°, 'T'), in a prone lying position.<h4>Results</h4>The results indicate a very large correlation between the HHD and the WBB. WBB provides acceptable reliability at I-Test D (CV = 9.97%, ICC = 0.88) and HHD in the I-Test D (CV = 8.90%, ICC = 0.94), I-Test ND (CV = 8.60%, ICC = 0.95) in peak strength values. The HHD is most reliable in D ASH I-Y-T (CV = 10.94%) and WBB (CV = 11.05%). In the ND ASH I-Y-T test, the HHD is the most reliable (CV = 12.5%) compared to the WBB (CV = 14.43%).<h4>Conclusions</h4>These results suggest that WBB is a reliable device to assess strength in the ASH test with a very large correlation with the HHD. WBB and HHD are two affordable devices to assess isometric shoulder strength.","dates":{"release":"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2024 Mar","modification":"2025-04-04T19:25:52.868Z","creation":"2025-04-04T19:25:52.868Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC10901178","cross_references":{"pubmed":["38425742"],"doi":["10.1177/17585732221145558"]}}