biostudies-literatureTaylor BNational Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West MidlandsMedical Research Councile0297857https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10901341biostudies-literatureUnknown19(2)<h4>Objectives</h4>To explore local induction of labour pathways in the UK National Health Service to provide insight into current practice.<h4>Design</h4>National survey.<h4>Setting</h4>Hospital maternity services in all four nations of the UK.<h4>Sample</h4>Convenience sample of 71 UK maternity units.<h4>Methods</h4>An online cross-sectional survey was disseminated and completed via a national network of obstetrics and gynaecology specialist trainees (October 2021-March 2022). Results were analysed descriptively, with associations explored using Fisher's Exact and ANOVA.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Induction rates, criteria, processes, delays, incidents, safety concerns.<h4>Results</h4>54/71 units responded (76%, 35% of UK units). Induction rate range 19.2%-53.4%, median 36.3%. 72% (39/54) had agreed induction criteria: these varied widely and were not all in national guidance. Multidisciplinary booking decision-making was not reported by 38/54 (70%). Delays reported 'often/always' in hospital admission for induction (19%, 10/54) and Delivery Suite transfer once induction in progress (63%, 34/54). Staffing was frequently reported cause of delay (76%, 41/54 'often/always'). Delays triggered incident reports in 36/54 (67%) and resulted in harm in 3/54 (6%). Induction was an area of concern (44%, 24/54); 61% (33/54) reported induction-focused quality improvement work.<h4>Conclusions</h4>There is substantial variation in induction rates, processes and policies across UK maternity services. Delays appear to be common and are a cause of safety concerns. With induction rates likely to increase, improved guidance and pathways are critically needed to improve safety and experience of care.PloS oneInduction of labour care in the UK: A cross-sectional survey of maternity units.PMC10901341970014MR/N022556/1Kenyon SUK Audit and Research Collaborative in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (UKARCOG) MembersTaylor BQuinn LMorad SDavidson LJohnston TCross-Sudworth FMorris RKRimmer MfalseInduction of labour care in the UK: A cross-sectional survey of maternity units.<h4>Objectives</h4>To explore local induction of labour pathways in the UK National Health Service to provide insight into current practice.<h4>Design</h4>National survey.<h4>Setting</h4>Hospital maternity services in all four nations of the UK.<h4>Sample</h4>Convenience sample of 71 UK maternity units.<h4>Methods</h4>An online cross-sectional survey was disseminated and completed via a national network of obstetrics and gynaecology specialist trainees (October 2021-March 2022). Results were analysed descriptively, with associations explored using Fisher's Exact and ANOVA.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Induction rates, criteria, processes, delays, incidents, safety concerns.<h4>Results</h4>54/71 units responded (76%, 35% of UK units). Induction rate range 19.2%-53.4%, median 36.3%. 72% (39/54) had agreed induction criteria: these varied widely and were not all in national guidance. Multidisciplinary booking decision-making was not reported by 38/54 (70%). Delays reported 'often/always' in hospital admission for induction (19%, 10/54) and Delivery Suite transfer once induction in progress (63%, 34/54). Staffing was frequently reported cause of delay (76%, 41/54 'often/always'). Delays triggered incident reports in 36/54 (67%) and resulted in harm in 3/54 (6%). Induction was an area of concern (44%, 24/54); 61% (33/54) reported induction-focused quality improvement work.<h4>Conclusions</h4>There is substantial variation in induction rates, processes and policies across UK maternity services. Delays appear to be common and are a cause of safety concerns. With induction rates likely to increase, improved guidance and pathways are critically needed to improve safety and experience of care.2024-01-01T00:00:00Z20242026-06-28T03:10:11.146Z2025-04-05T21:49:33.532ZS-EPMC109013413841675010.1371/journal.pone.0297857