<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14(1)</volume><submitter>Vallee A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) are recommended for the detection of acute cardiac rejection (ACR) despite limited sensitivity. We report the long-term post-transplant results of Doppler echocardiography as a noninvasive alternative of routine EMB.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Two cohorts of heart transplantation (HT) recipients were chronologically defined as follows: the Dual Monitoring Cohort (DMC) from January 1990 to December 1997 included patients who underwent routine EMB and Doppler echocardiography within 24 hours for ACR surveillance; and the "Echo-First Cohort" (EFC), including patients transplanted from January 1998 to December 2018 with Doppler echocardiography as first-line approach for ACR surveillance. Echocardiographic measurements of interest were collected: early diastolic (E) wave peak velocity; pressure half time (PHT) and isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT). Post-transplant outcomes were reviewed and the Kaplan-Meier approach was used for survival estimates. Inter-operator variability for ultrasound measurements was investigated. Data were collected from medical records from January 2019 to December 2020.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 228 patients were included, 99 patients in the DMC and 129 in the EFC. Overall, 5-, 10- and 15-year survival rates were 65.4%, 55.5% and 44.1% respectively, without any significant difference between the two cohorts (log rank test, P=0.71). Echocardiography variables and EMB findings were associated with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54-0.91], 0.74 (95% CI: 0.54-0.94) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.57-0.94) respectively for E wave, PHT and IVRT. IVRT and PHT were significantly decreased, and E wave significantly increased, in case of histologically proven ACR. Inter-operator variability was not significant for E wave and IVRT measurements (P=0.13 and 0.30 respectively).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Doppler echocardiography as a first-line method for surveillance of ACR did not impair long-term results after HT. These findings suggest that this non-invasive approach might be a reasonable alternative to systematic EMB, limiting risk and improving the quality of life.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy</journal><pagination>59-71</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10904291</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Doppler echocardiography for surveillance of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a 28-year single-center experience.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10904291</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Thomas de Montpreville V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vallee A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chatellier G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beaussier H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gaillard M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Genty T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fels A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kloeckner M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blanchard D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lemann T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Houyel L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>To NT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ramadan R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guihaire J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haulon S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deleuze P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Doppler echocardiography for surveillance of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a 28-year single-center experience.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) are recommended for the detection of acute cardiac rejection (ACR) despite limited sensitivity. We report the long-term post-transplant results of Doppler echocardiography as a noninvasive alternative of routine EMB.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Two cohorts of heart transplantation (HT) recipients were chronologically defined as follows: the Dual Monitoring Cohort (DMC) from January 1990 to December 1997 included patients who underwent routine EMB and Doppler echocardiography within 24 hours for ACR surveillance; and the "Echo-First Cohort" (EFC), including patients transplanted from January 1998 to December 2018 with Doppler echocardiography as first-line approach for ACR surveillance. Echocardiographic measurements of interest were collected: early diastolic (E) wave peak velocity; pressure half time (PHT) and isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT). Post-transplant outcomes were reviewed and the Kaplan-Meier approach was used for survival estimates. Inter-operator variability for ultrasound measurements was investigated. Data were collected from medical records from January 2019 to December 2020.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 228 patients were included, 99 patients in the DMC and 129 in the EFC. Overall, 5-, 10- and 15-year survival rates were 65.4%, 55.5% and 44.1% respectively, without any significant difference between the two cohorts (log rank test, P=0.71). Echocardiography variables and EMB findings were associated with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54-0.91], 0.74 (95% CI: 0.54-0.94) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.57-0.94) respectively for E wave, PHT and IVRT. IVRT and PHT were significantly decreased, and E wave significantly increased, in case of histologically proven ACR. Inter-operator variability was not significant for E wave and IVRT measurements (P=0.13 and 0.30 respectively).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Doppler echocardiography as a first-line method for surveillance of ACR did not impair long-term results after HT. These findings suggest that this non-invasive approach might be a reasonable alternative to systematic EMB, limiting risk and improving the quality of life.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-05T11:38:33.485Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T11:38:33.485Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10904291</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38434560</pubmed><doi>10.21037/cdt-23-305</doi></cross_references></HashMap>