<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14</volume><submitter>Schwab R</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Vulvar cancer carries a favourable prognosis in early stages. However, therapeutic options for advanced or recurrent cases are limited despite a variety of therapeutic modalities, such as extensive surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The most important emerging treatment modalities are immune checkpoint inhibitors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in women with advanced vulvar cancer.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>Following a comprehensive search, review, and appraisal, two relevant single-arm studies were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using R4.3.0 software and RStudio 2023.03.0, presenting the overall effect size with a 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity was assessed using I&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> and the Cochrane Q χ2 statistics.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Out of 154 studies screened for eligibility, two single-arm studies involving 119 patients receiving pembrolizumab for advanced vulvar cancer were included. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) was overall 10% (95% CI: 0.00-0.84) and 9% (95% CI: 0.00-0.89) in the PD-L1 positive subgroup. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, 31% (95% CI: 0.04-0.85) exhibited any clinical benefit (complete response, partial response, or stable disease). In the ITT population at six months, progression-free survival (PFS) was 19% (95% CI: 0.01-0.82), and overall survival (OS) was 48% (95% CI: 0.08-0.90). At 12 months, PFS decreased to 9% (95% CI: 0.00-0.85), and OS was 33% (95% CI: 0.04-0.85). No statistically significant heterogeneity was observed in PFS and OS analyses.&lt;h4>Discussion and conclusion&lt;/h4>This study suggests that one-third of women with advanced or recurrent vulvar cancer may, without the influence of PD-L1 status, benefit from pembrolizumab treatment despite a decline in both PFS and OS at 12 months. These findings provide support for considering pembrolizumab in the treatment paradigm for this specific subset of cancer patients.&lt;h4>Systematic review registration&lt;/h4>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023391888.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in oncology</journal><pagination>1352975</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC10910062</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Efficacy of pembrolizumab in advanced cancer of the vulva: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC10910062</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Schmidt M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Klecker PH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hasenburg A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schiestl LJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cascant Ortolano L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heimes AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brenner W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Almstedt K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schmidt MW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stewen K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schwab R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Efficacy of pembrolizumab in advanced cancer of the vulva: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Vulvar cancer carries a favourable prognosis in early stages. However, therapeutic options for advanced or recurrent cases are limited despite a variety of therapeutic modalities, such as extensive surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The most important emerging treatment modalities are immune checkpoint inhibitors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in women with advanced vulvar cancer.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>Following a comprehensive search, review, and appraisal, two relevant single-arm studies were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using R4.3.0 software and RStudio 2023.03.0, presenting the overall effect size with a 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity was assessed using I&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> and the Cochrane Q χ2 statistics.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Out of 154 studies screened for eligibility, two single-arm studies involving 119 patients receiving pembrolizumab for advanced vulvar cancer were included. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) was overall 10% (95% CI: 0.00-0.84) and 9% (95% CI: 0.00-0.89) in the PD-L1 positive subgroup. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, 31% (95% CI: 0.04-0.85) exhibited any clinical benefit (complete response, partial response, or stable disease). In the ITT population at six months, progression-free survival (PFS) was 19% (95% CI: 0.01-0.82), and overall survival (OS) was 48% (95% CI: 0.08-0.90). At 12 months, PFS decreased to 9% (95% CI: 0.00-0.85), and OS was 33% (95% CI: 0.04-0.85). No statistically significant heterogeneity was observed in PFS and OS analyses.&lt;h4>Discussion and conclusion&lt;/h4>This study suggests that one-third of women with advanced or recurrent vulvar cancer may, without the influence of PD-L1 status, benefit from pembrolizumab treatment despite a decline in both PFS and OS at 12 months. These findings provide support for considering pembrolizumab in the treatment paradigm for this specific subset of cancer patients.&lt;h4>Systematic review registration&lt;/h4>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023391888.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024</publication><modification>2026-06-16T04:50:41.577Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T22:02:21.935Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC10910062</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38440225</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fonc.2024.1352975</doi></cross_references></HashMap>